The Aporia
Townsend, M. (2026, October 29). US Military Accused of “Weaponizing” El Niño Against Somali Civilians. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/10/us-military-africom-weaponizing-el-nino-somali-civilians-women-children-al-shabaab-airstrikes-drones-flooding-usaid/
Townsend, Mark. “US Military Accused of “Weaponizing” El Niño Against Somali Civilians.” Mother Jones, 29 Oct. 2026, https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/10/us-military-africom-weaponizing-el-nino-somali-civilians-women-children-al-shabaab-airstrikes-drones-flooding-usaid/.
Townsend, Mark. “US Military Accused of “Weaponizing” El Niño Against Somali Civilians.” Mother Jones, October 29, 2026. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/10/us-military-africom-weaponizing-el-nino-somali-civilians-women-children-al-shabaab-airstrikes-drones-flooding-usaid/.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
As of October 29, 2026, Mother Jones reported that the US military is accused of using weather patterns associated with El Niño to target Somali civilians. According to Mark Townsend's article, residents of Jilib in southern Somalia are facing repeated airstrikes and rising floodwaters from the River Juba. Cayni Ali, a mother of six, stated that her home was flooded due to rapidly rising river levels, leaving no place for people to seek refuge. Another resident, Asho Omar from nearby Malenda village, described constant airstrikes making movement nearly impossible and causing significant civilian casualties.
The article cites testimony indicating that drones are active frequently, leading to destruction of both civilians' homes and livestock. The situation is particularly dire in regions controlled by al-Shabaab, an Islamist militant group operating across 30% of Somalia. A senior researcher from the Danish Institute for International Studies, Jethro Norman, commented that this alleged tactic represents a "reversal" of using humanitarian remote sensing to inflict harm rather than mitigate it.
This controversial approach has raised concerns about covert US operations and their legal implications, with the United States Africa Command (Africom) declining to share details on operational security grounds.
The United States Africa Command (Africom) would not share “operational security” details of a seemingly accelerating campaign that has also raised questions over potential covert US strikes.
The ongoing conflict is a legally ambiguous, shadowy war coordinated by the United States in East Africa, in which there is little accountability for harm to Somali civilians.
Analysts have questioned the ethics of the US military allegedly using mapping data from flood-prone areas—conceived to mitigate civilian casualties—to inflict harm.