J.D. Tuccille: Wealth-hating economists leverage credentials for billionaires tax

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

Jerema, C. (2026, October 29). J.D. Tuccille: Wealth-hating economists leverage credentials for billionaires tax. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/j-d-tuccille-wealth-hating-economists-leverage-credentials-for-billionaires-tax

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

National Post · collected 2026-10-29 · by Carson Jerema analysis

Quick Summary

J.D. Tuccille critiques California’s proposed wealth tax, which would impose a five percent tax on billionaires with assets over $1 billion. The measure aims to raise about $20 billion annually from 200 of the wealthiest Californians over five years for healthcare funding. However, critics argue that wealthy individuals are leaving the state due to this tax threat, potentially reducing revenue and causing an overall financial loss of $38.9 billion. Economists Gabriel Zucman and Emmanuel Saez support the proposal but face criticism for allegedly manipulating their research to favor ongoing heavy taxation on the rich.
Written by AI on 2026-10-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 114297: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-29

Story

📰 Billionaires Tax Economists
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 16% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 55 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the proposed wealth tax campaign in California, with Article A focusing on overall spending and opposition efforts, while Article B critiques the economic arguments and credentials behind the proposal.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Proposition 40 and its economic impact, rather than the same specific incident or moment.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Centre Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses the current polling status of Proposition 40 and its implications for the election, while Article B critiques the economic arguments behind the proposition.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
49
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
16%
8 of 49 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 1209 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Carson Jerema
59 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If California’s proposed wealth tax is defeated next week — polling now finds Prop. 40 underwater with voters — it will represent less a failure of economic arguments than of political activism given academic gloss.
🔮 One can see what they wish in the results, which will not be final until Friday afternoon, when all votes will be tallied.
🔮 She told the court she went off social media in the wake of the allegations so that she could focus on her publishing requirements, but that it was “difficult to miss what was going on.”
🔮 Indeed, the scale and magnitude of Eby’s misreading of the B.C. electorate in calling his early snap election cannot be understated and it may well be the greatest political blunder in Canadian history.
🔮 The Conservatives are projected to win 62 seats to the NDP’s 29 as of 9 p.m. local time.
🔮 The destruction we are now seeing in Europe will inevitably become more pervasive until it, too, manifests into violence by way of terrorism, if not armed insurrection.
2026-10-23 · assertive framing · Avi Benlolo: Why Toronto’s mayoralty race matters
🔮 The empty chair said more than any speech could.
🔮 Sharma refused to issue a ban, which she said would violate the open courtroom principle and was an “extreme measure,” but noted that media present in the courtroom could observe the woman’s request.
🔮 Given the riots’ aesthetic and demographic makeup, politicians on the right may feel increasingly emboldened to issue statements of this kind — which reflect the existential tenor with which the unrest has been received among right-wing populists the world over; as well as the enormous stakes voters of all hues will feel going into the presidential elections in April.
🔮 Saturday night, the city elected Green Party of Vancouver’s Pete Fry as mayor.
Also by Carson Jerema
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 59 articles by Carson Jerema →

Topics

California Californian Prop. 40 State University of California-Berkeley

Subjects

California GPE · 4× Zucman PERSON · 4× University of California-Berkeley ORG · 2× Benjamin Jaros PERSON · 1× Californian NORP · 1× Emmanuel Saez PERSON · 1× Gabriel Zucman PERSON · 1× Jared Walczak PERSON · 1× Joshua Rauh PERSON · 1× State ORG · 1×

Narrative

In 2024, summarizing a paper that examined state-level tax policies from 1900 to 2010, the University of California-Riverside noted, “the introduction of income tax in the post-World War II era led to out-migration by wealthy Americans” from states that imposed the tax.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-29
🔮 If California’s proposed wealth tax is defeated next week — polling now finds Prop. 40 underwater with voters — it will represent less a failure of economic arguments than of political activism given academic gloss.

Claims (49 extracted, 8 hedged)

If California’s proposed wealth tax is defeated next week — polling now finds Prop. 40 underwater with voters — it will represent less a failure of economic arguments than of political activism given academic gloss. asserted
it → propose → gloss
While the allegedly one-time five per cent tax on the assets of billionaires is based on the work of prominent economists Gabriel Zucman and Emmanuel Saez, the two University of California-Berkeley professors seem too willing to massage their research until it gives the results they seek. uncertain
they → base → results
And what they ultimately want isn’t a one-time tax on the rich, but heavy ongoing taxation to eliminate success. asserted
want → want → success
If passed, assets would be assessed at their value as of Dec. 31, 2026, for all individuals residing in the state on Jan. 1 of the same year — that is, 11 months before the tax’s potential passage. asserted
that → pass → passage
The tax would be payable in five annual installments “with each subsequent annual installment payment also being subject to an annual nondeductible deferral charge of 7.5 per cent of the remaining unpaid balance.” asserted
payment → remain → balance
Advocates of the tax claim the measure “would raise about $100 billion over five years 2027-2031 (or $20 billion/year) from the 200 wealthiest Californian taxpayers.” uncertain
measure → claim → taxpayers
Critics aren’t convinced. asserted
Critics → convince → ?
In a recent paper, economists Benjamin Jaros and Joshua Rauh point out that the tax’s threat is driving the wealthy to leave. asserted
threat → point → wealthy
“(P)ublicly confirmed departures already eliminated nearly 30 per cent of the wealth tax base before signatures were collected.” asserted
signatures → confirm → base
They believe the tax could collect $30 billion but that losses in income tax collection from those who left would make the wealth tax a net drain to the tune of — $38.9 billion. uncertain
tax → believe → billion
Infuriated by the report, Zucman took to X to protest that “moving to another state doesn’t allow one to avoid the tax, since the tax would be owed by billionaires who lived in California at the beginning of 2026.” asserted
who → take → 2026
He added, “(t)here is no incentive to move to another state. asserted
He → add → state
One cannot avoid the tax by moving.” asserted
One → avoid → tax
But some high-wealth people have moved and continue to do so. asserted
people → move → ?
For starters, it’s not obvious that moving is pointless. asserted
moving → ’ → starters
Many experts, including Jared Walczak of the Tax Foundation, argue that “the retroactive residency date is fatally flawed under Supreme Court precedent barring retroactive imposition of a ‘wholly new tax.’” asserted
date → include → tax
Legal challenges to the law enjoy a good chance of success. asserted
challenges → enjoy → success
Additionally, the measure removes the state constitution’s cap on taxes on intangible personal property and changes California’s tax environment. asserted
measure → remove → environment
It may be a stalking horse for future taxes. uncertain
It → stalk → taxes
“Once that cap is lifted, future ballot initiatives and legislative action can build on the authority this amendment creates to impose additional wealth taxes at any rate, on any threshold,” warn Jaros and Rauh. asserted
Jaros → lift → threshold
“Thus, the Act establishes constitutional infrastructure for wealth taxation while presenting itself as a bounded, ‘one-time’ event.” asserted
Act → establish → event
People with means — even moderately so — tend to flee governments that covet their money. asserted
that → tend → money
In 2024, summarizing a paper that examined state-level tax policies from 1900 to 2010, the University of California-Riverside noted, “the introduction of income tax in the post-World War II era led to out-migration by wealthy Americans” from states that imposed the tax. asserted
that → summarize → tax
Most likely, Zucman ignored legal pitfalls and history because they’re inconvenient to his mission. asserted
they → ignore → mission
“He has gone from a historical and quantitative analysis of inequalities to an activist approach. asserted
He → go → approach
And he is now trapped by the public persona he has become. asserted
he → trap → persona
That makes scientific debate more difficult,” Antoine Levy, another University of California-Berkeley economist who has clashed with Zucman, told Le Monde in an otherwise sympathetic profile of the Prop. 40 booster. asserted
who → make → booster
Zucman’s flaws extend beyond ignoring historical evidence about people’s reactions to taxation. asserted
flaws → extend → taxation
On X, economic historian Phil Magness noted: “In 2019, California billionaire tax crusader Gabriel Zucman made an astonishing claim to the NY Times: billionaires pay a lower avg tax rate than poor people in the U.S. uncertain
billionaires → note → U.S.
I noticed something fishy though: Zucman’s NYT chart did not match his own published data from a 2018 paper.” asserted
chart → notice → paper
Independent Institute research fellow Kristian Fors agrees, pointing out that the widely publicized work of Zucman and Saez forming the basis for the wealth tax claimed, “the overall tax rate for the top 400 richest households in the nation was 23 per cent.” asserted
rate → agree → nation
But this contradicts the duo’s earlier research, which “estimated that the top one per cent paid an overall tax rate of approximately 36 per cent” and put the tax rate for the very highest earners at 41 per cent. asserted
cent → contradict → cent
The lower estimated tax rate was the result of unusual accounting. asserted
rate → estimate → accounting
Fors emphasized that conventional analysis accepts that corporate taxes affect shareholders, workers, and consumers as the tax gets passed on. asserted
tax → emphasize → shareholders
That produces the earlier estimate of a 41 per cent tax rate for the wealthiest. asserted
That → produce → wealthiest
To get the 23 per cent figure, Zucman and Saez used a non-standard analysis and didn’t submit it to peer-review. asserted
Zucman → get → review
Playing fast and loose with economic research methods is a risky move if you’re trying to promote a one-time tax in one American state. asserted
you → play → state
But it might look worthwhile for activists trying to change the world. uncertain
it → look → world
Interviewed by the University of California-Berkeley in January, Zucman advocated an annual worldwide wealth tax of two per cent on the assets of the rich — as a starting point. asserted
Zucman → interview → point
“I hope it would encourage countries to create more progressive wealth taxes,” he boasted. asserted
he → hope → taxes
…and 9 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support