Oregon Senator Ron Wyden and Massachusetts Senator Edward Markey sent a letter to Meta on Wednesday demanding the company answer for the privacy concerns its smart glasses pose to the public.
asserted
glasses → send → public
The letter cites 404 Media’s October 2025 investigation into how people use Meta’s smart glasses to harass massage parlor workers.
asserted
people → cite → workers
That investigation found Instagram accounts with hundreds of thousands of followers and millions of views uploaded videos filmed with Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses, where men entered massage parlors across the country and solicited the workers for sex work.
asserted
men → find → work
“Meta’s own disclosures confirm that imagery processed through its glasses’ visual AI features may be retained and used to train AI systems, including with the assistance of human reviewers,” the letter says.
uncertain
letter → confirm → reviewers
“Using intimate imagery for AI development is itself an invasion of privacy when the people depicted have not consented to that use, as is inherently the case for most bystanders captured by Meta’s glasses.
asserted
people → use → glasses
Retaining that material for AI development, thereby extending the period during which it can be accessed, disclosed, or misused, exploits people’s highly sensitive information for Meta’s commercial benefit.
asserted
it → retain → benefit
Research published in August revealed how Meta’s platforms encourage an ecosystem of abusive, harassing content from pickup artists and influencers who use Meta’s smart glasses to capture interactions with people minding their own business in public or at their workplaces, who might not even know they’re being filmed.
uncertain
they → publish → workplaces
In a January report by the BBC, a woman who was recorded with the glasses said she was “bombarded” with phone calls because her phone number was posted with the video, and men who had seen the video stalked her at work.
asserted
who → record → work
Earlier this year, more than 70 people sued Meta, claiming that their intimate images and videos were exposed to workers hired by the company to label the data for AI.
asserted
images → sue → AI
In March, Swedish journalists reported that Kenyan data labelers were viewing and annotating uncensored footage from Meta’s smart glasses, including sexual and violent content; Meta ended its contract with those workers less than two months later.
asserted
Meta → report → workers
These are labor conditions that groups like the Data Labelers Association in Kenya are fighting back against, and for the people whose images are in the videos and photos, it’s an obvious violation of their privacy.
asserted
it → fight → privacy
People have also been modding these glasses to disable the light that indicates they’re recording for years
Meta has played dumb about the difference between AI glasses you wear on your face and an iPhone for a long time.
asserted
you → modde → time
Now, these senators want the tech giant to answer for themselves.
asserted
giant → want → themselves
In the letter, Wyden and Markey demand answers about what safeguards, if any, Meta has in place to prevent the nonconsensual “capture, disclosure, or processing of sensitive and intimate imagery,” whether Meta specifically evaluated the potential for its glasses “to facilitate voyeurism, nonconsensual intimate image capture, or similar privacy invasions,” what imagery it uses for AI training, and whether people can request their biometric and other data captured by its glasses be deleted, along with several more questions about the glasses’ safety and design.
asserted
data → demand → safety
Human review to fulfill a service knowingly requested by the person depicted is one thing; exposing unsuspecting individuals’ intimate moments to strangers for AI training is quite another,” Wyden and Markey wrote.
asserted
Wyden → fulfill → training
“The individuals whose naked bodies, sexual activity, and other private moments have reportedly been captured by Meta glasses did not knowingly agree to having those images shared with strangers, much less for the purpose of improving Meta’s commercial AI systems.
uncertain
images → capture → systems
That disclosure and processing is an invasion of privacy, regardless of whether the footage is subsequently published or misused.
asserted
footage → publish → privacy
In the last few weeks, Meta has come under fire for quietly changing its privacy policies for business accounts and granting itself permission to scrape user’s content and connected websites to develop its AI products.
asserted
Meta → come → products
Meta has been pushing its smart glasses over the years with ads featuring A-list celebrities, including Chris Pratt, Chris Hemsworth, and Kris Jenner (all three in a 2025 Superbowl ad), Doja Cat, Jennie Kim from K-pop group BLACKPINK, and most recently, Kylie Jenner.
asserted
Meta → push → BLACKPINK
Guerrilla ad makers have countered with their own anti-AI glasses ads around the world, and people have started calling the smart glasses "pervert glasses" in response to these widespread invasions of privacy they've come to represent.
asserted
they → counter → privacy
In August, Meta filed a patent to add facial recognition and highlight reel features to its smart glasses.
asserted
Meta → file → glasses
The Aporia
