Fate of private member’s bill to amend Divorce Act still not clear

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Karadeglija, A. (2026, October 28). Fate of private member’s bill to amend Divorce Act still not clear. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/fate-of-private-member-s-bill-to-amend-divorce-act-still-not-clear/article_7f2ff8d1-89fc-5534-9b05-78d19536e926.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-10-28 · by Anja Karadeglija

Quick Summary

The Canadian government is considering supporting parts of a private member’s bill proposed by Liberal MP Lisa Hepfner to amend the Divorce Act, though details remain unclear. Women’s groups had expressed concern that the government might abandon its support for Bill C-223, which aims to address parental alienation claims and other issues. Justice Minister Sean Fraser said the government is positive about the bill but wants certain amendments due to concerns over judicial discretion. Hepfner did not specify which parts of the bill might be altered despite some elements being more controversial than others.
Written by AI on 2026-10-28, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The fate of Bill C-223, a private member’s bill introduced by Liberal MP Lisa Hepfner to amend the Divorce Act, remains uncertain as of October 28, 2026. The bill aims to curb parental alienation claims and other changes but faces potential obstacles due to concerns over judicial discretion raised by Justice Minister Sean Fraser. Women’s groups had warned that the government might be reconsidering its support for the bill, which is currently under review by a House of Commons committee. Hepfner acknowledged there are controversial elements in the bill but declined to specify which parts could be amended or removed.

Written for “Private Member's Bill Amend Divorce Act Fate Unclear” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.35, but all 2 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 113005: attributed speech only · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 Private Member's Bill Amend Divorce Act Fate Unclear
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
6
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
33%
2 of 6 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 10106 article(s) · 27 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 27 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Anja Karadeglija
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The government is indicating it’s open to supporting elements of a private member’s bill to amend the Divorce Act, though it’s not clear what the bill ultimately will look like.
🔮 Canadian news companies say they’re worried about changes to Meta’s terms of service and want the company to clarify how they will be affected.
🔮 The Liberal government says while its proposed digital safety legislation might affect freedom of expression, the bill itself is consistent with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
🔮 In June, the federal government said it would tell the CRTC to change course on requiring big streamers like Netflix to contribute to Canadian content, and would instead provide funding directly. But four months later, the government still isn’t saying when it will provide the new direction to the CRTC or disburse the $600 million.
🔮 Prime Minister Mark Carney will take a hands-on role in setting the agenda for Ottawa’s new AI advisory council.
🔮 OTTAWA - Prime Minister Mark Carney will “play an active role” in setting the agenda for Ottawa’s new AI advisory council.
🔮 In an online post on Sept. 24, Perreaux wrote that an editor at Türkiye Today contacted him to ask him to vouch for Robson — and he realized he couldn’t. “The key moment where my heart sank was when the Turkish journalist told me that Daniel Robson refused to do a video call,” Perreaux said in an interview.
🔮 Niki Sharma said Friday that she had not received a response because of the “rapidly evolving” situation but the changes need to “ensure a clearer pathway for human and corporate accountability for the actions of AI.” “I think if we do the right changes to the Criminal Code, it will change the behaviour of AI companies, because there will be a clear line to accountability,” she said at an unrelated news conference.
🔮 Bengio is set to address the UN Security Council today, which will also hear from major AI companies.
🔮 Bengio is set to address the UN Security Council today, which will also hear from major AI companies.
Also by Anja Karadeglija
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Anja Karadeglija →

Topics

Bill C-223, House of Commons Liberal OTTAWA the Divorce Act

Subjects

Liberal NORP · 2× Hepfner PERSON · 1× House of Commons ORG · 1× Justice ORG · 1× Lisa Hepfner PERSON · 1× OTTAWA GPE · 1× Sean Fraser PERSON · 1× The Canadian Press ORG · 1×

Narrative

The government is indicating it’s open to supporting elements of a private member’s bill to amend the Divorce Act, though it’s not clear what the bill ultimately will look like.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 The government is indicating it’s open to supporting elements of a private member’s bill to amend the Divorce Act, though it’s not clear what the bill ultimately will look like.
2026-10-28 · Toronto Star
Fate of private member’s bill to amend Divorce Act still not clear · mixed framing

Claims (6 extracted, 2 hedged)

The government is indicating it’s open to supporting elements of a private member’s bill to amend the Divorce Act, though it’s not clear what the bill ultimately will look like. asserted
bill → indicate → what
Women’s groups warned last week that it appeared the Liberal government had changed its mind and the bill, currently in front of a House of Commons committee, could be killed. uncertain
bill → warn → committee
Justice Minister Sean Fraser said Wednesday he is optimistic about the bill but the government wants to see some amendments. asserted
government → say → amendments
He said the government is concerned about the bill’s possible effect on judicial discretion. asserted
government → say → discretion
Hepfner told reporters there are elements of the bill that are more controversial than others, but declined to say which elements could be removed. uncertain
elements → tell → others
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 28, 2026. asserted
report → publish → Press
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support