New York Times editor admits paper should be more 'discerning' on labeling liberals

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Panreck, H. (2026, October 28). New York Times editor admits paper should be more 'discerning' on labeling liberals. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-editor-admits-paper-should-more-discerning-labeling-liberals

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-28 · by Hanna Panreck

Quick Summary

New York Times editor Patrick Healy admitted during a podcast interview on Thursday that the paper inconsistently applies political labels like "conservative" to analysts and professors. This acknowledgment followed law professor Josh Blackman’s criticism of being labeled a “conservative” in two recent articles, while similar liberal counterparts were not similarly identified. Blackman noted that conservative labels appear more frequently than liberal ones in Times reporting, suggesting an imbalance where liberal positions are seen as neutral default views. Healy agreed with Blackman's critique and stated the need for the paper to be more discerning in its use of political labels.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On October 28, 2026, Patrick Healy, the assistant managing editor for Standards and Trust at the New York Times, admitted during an interview on Fox News’ "Sound Off" podcast that the newspaper inconsistently applies political labels to analysts and professors. This admission came after law professor Josh Blackman reached out to express his frustration with being labeled a "conservative" in two separate Times articles within 24 hours, despite not always identifying himself as such politically. Blackman noted that while he agreed the label was accurate, media outlets like the Times often inconsistently apply political labels to scholars based on their views rather than a consistent criteria. Healy acknowledged the need for greater discernment in labeling individuals as conservative or liberal and suggested focusing instead on potential reasons for conflicts of interest when evaluating bias. The issue highlights ongoing concerns about media objectivity and fairness in reporting, particularly regarding academic perspectives.

Written for “New York Times Editor On Labeling Liberals” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but all 2 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 112624: attributed speech only · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 New York Times Editor On Labeling Liberals
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 19 📰 publisher trust 67
“While both articles discuss an interview with the New York Times editor regarding labeling practices, Article A focuses on the Wall Street Journal's praise for the NYT's openness to criticism, whereas Article B specifically reports on the content of the editor's admission and interaction with Josh Blackman.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 27 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 5764 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Hanna Panreck
24 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I would — if you’re trying to build up trust and standards, I would focus on the potential reason for a conflict or bias, and not just how the person identifies politically," Blackman said.
🔮 It's discouraged CEOs of corporations in the private sector to be philanthropic and charitable with their money and give to HBCUs because they're fearful it will be perceived as a DEI initiative being exercised by them.
🔮 Dhillon pledged in July that the Trump administration will pursue every provable case of illegal voting under what she described as a "broken windows" enforcement strategy, marking a sharp shift from prior administrations as the DOJ intensifies scrutiny of voter rolls following revelations that noncitizens were registered to vote in New Jersey.
🔮 "And the thing that was the greatest, there's so many points, I could do an hour on it, is that, you know, two Democrats, two Republicans sit down, break bread, have laughs, talk about, have tough conversations on a lot of the issues."
🔮 I think it's going to be different, and it's going to feel different, and it will also — it will feel like, I don't know, just a little like neutered if we're like going through the motions again,'" Meyers continued.
🔮 Clinton was asked about how she would address Democrats who feel that their vote doesn't matter during the event.
🔮 Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, a democratic socialist, has run into major roadblocks while trying to enact her agenda in the city as she grapples with public safety concerns and homelessness.
🔮 He is so devoid of actual talent that nobody with any commonsense would ever watch him unless it was to laugh at his miserable failures," White House Spokesman Davis Ingle told Fox News Digital.
🔮 The fake news won’t, so President Trump will continue to tout his economic wins to Americans."
🔮 The group went on to speculate about why Kimmel drew the most attention from the president, and Meyers said, "Other than the fact that you don't like him, we think he would want to hang out with you.
Also by Hanna Panreck
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 24 articles by Hanna Panreck →

Topics

Fox News Digital New York Times Standards and Trust Times Westlaw

Subjects

Healy PERSON · 7× Blackman PERSON · 6× Times ORG · 6× New York Times ORG · 3× Fox News Digital ORG · 2× Obama PERSON · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Josh Blackman PERSON · 1× Patrick Healy PERSON · 1× Standards and Trust ORG · 1×

Narrative

He said, "And some of your reporters have said, well, 'Professor Blackman has filed briefs in support of the Trump administration', or 'has filed a brief in opposition to the Obama administration on health care,' or, you know, 'has filed a brief in support of the Texas attorney general' — whatever it happens to be.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 I would — if you’re trying to build up trust and standards, I would focus on the potential reason for a conflict or bias, and not just how the person identifies politically," Blackman said.

Claims (27 extracted, 0 hedged)

A New York Times editor acknowledged during an interview on Thursday that the paper applied political labels to analysts and professors inconsistently after a law professor challenged the newspaper's decision to identify him as a conservative. asserted
professor → acknowledge → conservative
Patrick Healy, the assistant managing editor for Standards and Trust at the Times, said during the "Sound Off" podcast that law professor Josh Blackman reached out after he was labeled a "conservative" in Times reporting twice within 24 hours. " asserted
he → manage → hours
Josh, you reached out after the Times twice described you as a, quote, conservative, end quote, law professor. asserted
Times → reach → professor
And you said the conservative label was accurate, but that The Times applies labels like conservative and liberal inconsistently to law professors and analysts, and that a scholar’s view should speak for itself," Healy said. asserted
Healy → say → itself
Blackman described the issue as a longstanding grievance with all major media outlets and said he was quoted twice as a "conservative law professor" in New York Times articles in February. asserted
he → describe → February
"I just thought that was strange. asserted
that → think → ?
So I went through the Westlaw archives and just sort of searched for 'liberal' law professors and 'conservative' law professors in the New York Times database, and it was far more likely that you’re identifying a conservative than a liberal. asserted
you → go → liberal
And those numbers are stacked because liberals are quoted even more often. asserted
liberals → stack → ?
So the numbers even have a greater disparity," he said during the conversation with Healy. asserted
he → have → Healy
"And this sort of reinforces, I think, a perception that both the academy and, frankly, the media views a liberal position as a neutral position. asserted
academy → reinforce → position
And that’s why you have to have this sort of nomenclature, this sort of adjective to describe it," Blackman said. asserted
Blackman → ’ → it
He said he wrote a letter to the editor in February and the Times didn't publish it, but added that he appreciated Healy reaching out to him about it. asserted
Healy → say → it
Healy went on to acknowledge the validity of Blackman's critique: "I think there’s real truth to your critique and it’s something we need to do a better job on." "It can come off like The Times treats liberals as normal and conservatives as unique and worthy of labeling," Healy said. asserted
Healy → go → labeling
"In the legal academy, there are a lot of liberals, but that doesn’t justify it. asserted
that → be → it
I think we need to be more discerning about it." asserted
we → think → it
Fox News Digital reached out to the New York Times for comment. asserted
Digital → reach → comment
Blackman argued that the label should reflect a professor's involvement in an issue rather than their political affiliation. asserted
label → argue → issue
He said, "And some of your reporters have said, well, 'Professor Blackman has filed briefs in support of the Trump administration', or 'has filed a brief in opposition to the Obama administration on health care,' or, you know, 'has filed a brief in support of the Texas attorney general' — whatever it happens to be. asserted
it → say → general
That's actually a data point that's useful because it shows a person has sort of a dog in the fight." asserted
person → show → fight
He said broad labels, such as conservative and liberal, don't tell the reader much. asserted
labels → say → much
"So it presumes that, well, because he’s conservative, you know, you should discount his views supporting Trump, or conversely, because the person’s liberal, you should perhaps discount their views supporting President Obama or President Biden, whoever it happens to be. asserted
it → presume → Obama
I would — if you’re trying to build up trust and standards, I would focus on the potential reason for a conflict or bias, and not just how the person identifies politically," Blackman said. asserted
Blackman → try → conflict
Curtis Houck, a managing editor at NewsBusters, told Fox News Digital in a statement, "It seems like Healy is aiming to go to Halloween parties this weekend as Captain Obvious. asserted
Healy → manage → Obvious
It's one thing to recognize you have a problem, but as most people are aware, that's only step one, and it can often be used to punt or not actually follow through on changes." asserted
it → recognize → changes
Houck added, "Healy, if pressed on camera, would probably try to back off or memory hole this conversation instead of making any concrete commitment to The Times doing any better. asserted
Times → add → commitment
He's probably more upset that someone reached out to catch the paper red-handed instead of the fact that he — through his own journalism career — and his colleagues have spent more than a lifetime burying and/or smearing conservatives." asserted
he → reach → conservatives
The Wall Street Journal's assistant editor to the editorial page, James Freeman, praised the NYT in a piece on Monday, and credited them for acknowledging a source's criticism. asserted
editor → praise → criticism
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support