Artificial general intelligence: Has AI surpassed human cognitive abilities?

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Ali, W. (2026, October 28). Artificial general intelligence: Has AI surpassed human cognitive abilities? The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/chatgpt-ai-openai-anthropic-artificial-general-intelligence-b3075085.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-10-28 · by Waqas Ali

Quick Summary

Greg Brockman, president of OpenAI, recently suggested that their advanced model GPT-6 Astra might represent artificial general intelligence (AGI), an AI system capable of outperforming humans in many cognitive tasks but not physical labor. While some experts like Demis Hassabis argue AGI should be able to perform nearly any human task with brilliance, others such as Yann LeCun doubt the term's validity and prefer "human-level AI." Brockman acknowledges that the arrival of AGI is less clear-cut than initially thought, yet he believes OpenAI has reached this milestone. This debate intensified after Anthropic’s CEO called for slowing down AI development, an opinion echoed by Sam Altman and Elon Musk.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

OpenAI’s president, Greg Brockman, recently suggested at a closed press briefing in September that the company's advanced model, known as GPT-6 Astra, could signify the arrival of artificial general intelligence (AGI). OpenAI defines AGI as an AI system capable of outperforming humans in most economically valuable work, including tasks like writing code and managing projects. This definition excludes physical labor but acknowledges that advancements in robotics might change this in the future. However, some experts believe that true AGI will involve cognitive leaps beyond current AI capabilities. Brockman's acknowledgment reflects a shift from expecting a clear milestone for AGI to recognizing its gradual emergence.

Written for “Artificial General Intelligence Debate” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 112590 · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 Artificial General Intelligence Debate
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 17% hedged 2 of 12
“The articles discuss different aspects and concerns related to AI, with no indication they are reporting on the same specific incident or time.”
The Independent
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 57% hedged 13 of 23 📰 publisher trust 59
“The articles discuss different companies (Anthropic and OpenAI) and their respective warnings or advancements in AI, indicating distinct events.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 15% hedged 2 of 13 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A discusses OpenAI's plans to buy Google's AI chips, while Article B focuses on a statement by OpenAI’s president about artificial general intelligence (AGI). These are different specific events.”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 20% hedged 1 of 5 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss different aspects of artificial intelligence companies and their financials, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 1 📰 publisher trust 70
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI development and regulation, not the same specific incident.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 15 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI development and summits, without clearly reporting on the same specific incident or time.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
56
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
5 of 56 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3265 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Waqas Ali
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 OpenAI’s president, Greg Brockman, recently suggested that its advanced model, known as GPT-6 Astra, could mark the arrival of something called artificial general intelligence, or AGI.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Astra GPT-6 Astra Google DeepMind Independent OpenAI

Subjects

OpenAI ORG · 7× Astra ORG · 6× Brockman PERSON · 3× ARC Prize ORG · 2× Demis Hassabis PERSON · 1× Google DeepMind ORG · 1× Greg Brockman PERSON · 1× Independent NORP · 1× Meta ORG · 1× Yann LeCun PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Venturebeat magazine reported Brockman acknowledging this at a closed press briefing about GPT-6 Astra in September when he said: “When we started OpenAI, we kind of thought that there was going to be this well-defined moment that everyone would recognise … it hasn’t played out like that.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 OpenAI’s president, Greg Brockman, recently suggested that its advanced model, known as GPT-6 Astra, could mark the arrival of something called artificial general intelligence, or AGI.
2026-10-28 · The Independent
Artificial general intelligence: Has AI surpassed human cognitive abilities? · assertive framing

Claims (56 extracted, 5 hedged)

OpenAI’s president, Greg Brockman, recently suggested that its advanced model, known as GPT-6 Astra, could mark the arrival of something called artificial general intelligence, or AGI. uncertain
model → suggest → something
If AI itself is often defined as the ability to simulate human intelligence, OpenAI defines AGI as an AI system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work – to be better at the majority of digital and cognitive tasks a human can perform. asserted
human → define → tasks
This includes tasks such as writing computer code, organisational activities or managing projects. asserted
This → include → projects
For now, at least, it excludes work that involves physical labour, such as agriculture or construction. asserted
that → exclude → agriculture
Though the integration of AI with robotics means such sectors of industry may not be the exclusive domain of humans forever. uncertain
sectors → mean → humans
This definition by OpenAI focuses on breadth of competency by an AI system. asserted
definition → focus → system
However, other experts maintain that AGI will be characterised by additional cognitive leaps beyond present-day AI models. asserted
AGI → maintain → models
For example, Demis Hassabis, founder of Google DeepMind, has said that AGI should be able to do “pretty much any cognitive task that humans can do”. asserted
humans → say → that
This definition makes AGI more about brilliance and a bit less about depth. asserted
AGI → make → depth
Yann LeCun, former chief AI scientist at Meta, believes the term AGI itself is flawed and should be replaced by “human-level AI”. asserted
AGI → believe → AI
These represent snapshots from a vigorous ongoing debate over when AGI will arrive and how to recognise it. asserted
AGI → represent → it
Venturebeat magazine reported Brockman acknowledging this at a closed press briefing about GPT-6 Astra in September when he said: “When we started OpenAI, we kind of thought that there was going to be this well-defined moment that everyone would recognise … it hasn’t played out like that.” asserted
it → report → that
But he added: “For me personally, I do think we’re there.” asserted
we → add → me
Just a few days after Brockman made his comments, the chief executive of Anthropic, Dario Amodei, called in an essay titled: “We must pace the frontier” for the AI industry to slow down the pace of its development. asserted
industry → make → development
Within hours of this essay being published, both Sam Altman and Elon Musk signalled their agreement. asserted
Altman → publish → agreement
The evidence still points in more than one direction and is therefore inconclusive. asserted
evidence → point → direction
The clearest shift with GPT-6 Astra is in how people use it. asserted
people → use → it
Earlier models needed detailed instructions at each step. asserted
models → need → step
Astra is built for longer jobs where the user sets a goal and some boundaries, and the model works out the sequence itself. asserted
model → build → sequence
OpenAI’s demonstrations showed the frontier model handling several unrelated tasks at once. asserted
model → show → tasks
The company presents this as moving past the pattern in which a human supplies the next instruction every time. asserted
human → present → instruction
That is a real change, and it is the part most users will notice first. asserted
users → notice → ?
One of the benchmarks show that Astra scored 99.9% on ARC-AGI-3, a test that places an AI agent in unfamiliar interactive games with no instructions and measures how efficiently it works out the rules. asserted
it → show → rules
OpenAI estimates that the average human scored 48% when asked to work out the same unfamiliar games. asserted
human → estimate → games
The detail matters here, however. asserted
detail → matter → ?
ARC Prize, which runs the benchmark, reported that Astra’s best score through the shared “harness” it gives every model was 62.7%. asserted
it → run → model
A harness is a kind of software operating system, or physical environment, within which the AI system works. asserted
system → operate → which
ARC Prize provides Astra with this software harness. asserted
Prize → provide → harness
The 99.9% came from a different harness, built by OpenAI for Astra, which preserves the AI model’s reasoning between requests. asserted
which → come → requests
Essentially, Astra did better when it was able to reuse previous work and wasn’t “starting from scratch” between requests in terms of its reasoning. asserted
it → do → reasoning
Evaluators disagree asserted
Evaluators → disagree → ?
Independent evaluators disagree about how much of an advance GPT-6 Astra represents on its predecessor. asserted
Astra → disagree → predecessor
The independent research institute Epoch AI places it right at the frontier, alongside other cutting-edge AI models such as Claude Fable 5.1, Kimi K3 and GPT-5.5 Pro. asserted
institute → place → Fable
The independent analysis company Artificial Analysis did not rate it as being radically ahead of its predecessor – GPT-5.6 Sol. asserted
company → rate → predecessor
Toby Walsh, an AI researcher at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, described the intelligence in frontier AI models such as GPT-6 Astra and others as “still today very jagged”, telling Al Jazeera that there are simple things that even the best AI models do poorly. asserted
models → describe → that
On September 8 2026, OpenAI published a claimed solution to the Navier-Stokes problem, one of seven Millennium Prize problems in mathematics. asserted
OpenAI → publish → mathematics
This has often been reported as Astra’s work. asserted
This → report → work
OpenAI says the proof came from an unreleased internal model, significantly more capable than Astra, running roughly 10,000 AI agents (AI models that perform tasks in response to human instructions) in parallel for about 88 hours. asserted
that → say → hours
Astra’s contribution was the formalisation and verification afterwards, which took a further 17 hours. asserted
which → take → hours
The proof has not yet been checked by the mathematical community. asserted
proof → check → community
…and 16 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support