Riverfire fireworks delayed after CFMEU members let on to construction site

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
Cite

Murray, W. (2026, October 28). Riverfire fireworks delayed after CFMEU members let on to construction site. ABC News (AU). https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-10-28/queensland-cfmeu-inquiry-riverfire-fireworks-bridge/107319344

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-10-28 · by Will Murray

Quick Summary

During the 2023 Riverfire fireworks event in Brisbane, a senior construction manager admitted to allowing members of the CFMEU and others onto an under-construction bridge to watch the display. This led to a delay in the fireworks show after police were called to remove unauthorized individuals from the site. The incident is part of ongoing public hearings for the Queensland inquiry into the CFMEU, which run until December 10.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In 2023, a senior construction manager from BESIX Watpac, Bradley Ross, admitted during the Queensland inquiry into the CFMEU that he allowed union members and their families onto an under-construction Kangaroo Point green bridge site to watch Riverfire fireworks. This incident nearly caused the cancellation of Riverfire due to safety concerns, with police being called to clear the area after discovering unauthorized individuals in the fireworks exclusion zone, leading to a delay in the event's start time. Ross stated that he had previously granted similar requests and did not intend to seek favor from the CFMEU but acknowledged potential repercussions for denying access. The incident highlights tensions between construction companies and labor unions in Brisbane, particularly regarding public safety and union influence over site access.

Written for “Riverfire Delays Due To Construction Site Issues” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 111213 · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 Riverfire Delays Due To Construction Site Issues
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 9% hedged 3 of 32 📰 publisher trust 61
“Both articles describe a single incident where a construction site party hosted by Bradley Ross almost cancelled Riverfire fireworks in 2023.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
35
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 35 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
68/100
ABC News (AU)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 4169 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Will Murray
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I could have rejected their entry … that would've probably done me a dis-favour [sic], but I wasn't trying to seek favour."
🔮 The appeals court will consider their verdict which could take several weeks.
🔮 "I had to throw my body back at the pedestrian crossing to get back onto the street, because if I hadn't, I would've been hit by the truck." Loading...
🔮 Soane Tuakalau told a commission of inquiry into the CFMEU that being struck in the head in the brawl caused him "to see red". What's next? This week's hearings are expected to hear from witnesses on union activity at the Dutton Park Cross River Rail site.
Also by Will Murray
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

BESIX Watpac CFMEU Queensland Riverfire the Commission of Inquiry

Subjects

Ross PERSON · 13× CFMEU ORG · 8× BESIX Watpac ORG · 2× Riverfire ORG · 2× Brad Ross PERSON · 1× Eddy Gisonda KC PERSON · 1× Gisonda PERSON · 1× Queensland GPE · 1× the Commission of Inquiry ORG · 1×

Narrative

In short: The CFMEU inquiry has heard a senior construction manager admitted to letting members of the public and union members on to an under-construction bridge during Riverfire in 2023 to watch the fireworks.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 I could have rejected their entry … that would've probably done me a dis-favour [sic], but I wasn't trying to seek favour."
2026-10-28 · ABC News (AU)
Riverfire fireworks delayed after CFMEU members let on to construction site · assertive framing

Claims (35 extracted, 1 hedged)

In short: The CFMEU inquiry has heard a senior construction manager admitted to letting members of the public and union members on to an under-construction bridge during Riverfire in 2023 to watch the fireworks. asserted
manager → hear → fireworks
The fireworks had to be delayed until the area was cleared by police. What's next? asserted
What → have → police
Public hearings for the ongoing inquiry run until December 10. asserted
hearings → run → December
A senior manager at a major construction company has admitted to letting people onto a construction site during the 2023 Riverfire, which led to the delay of the fireworks. asserted
which → admit → fireworks
Brad Ross, operations manager for BESIX Watpac, told the Queensland inquiry into the CFMEU he let a large group of people into the Kangaroo Point green bridge site to watch the event. asserted
group → tell → event
Most of those in attendance were members of the CFMEU, who Mr Ross told the inquiry had been invited by a union member who had watched Riverfire with him and his family the year before. asserted
who → tell → him
Police were called to the site after officers stationed on the water noticed people walking out on the under-construction bridge and into the fireworks exclusion zone. asserted
people → call → zone
It was Mr Ross's evidence that he was contacted by police who asked him to check if there were people on the bridge. asserted
who → contact → bridge
"I reported back to police that it was clear," Mr Ross told the inquiry. asserted
Ross → report → inquiry
However, body-cam footage played to the inquiry contradicted that evidence. asserted
footage → play → evidence
It showed two officers arrived on site and asking to be let in. asserted
officers → show → site
They were greeted by men wearing CFMEU merchandise who took more than five minutes to locate Mr Ross, who was considered "in charge". asserted
who → greet → charge
Mr Ross was initially reticent to let police carry out the inspection, telling them "there's only two people out there and I'll drag them back here". " asserted
I → let → them
After then letting the officers in, the video shows Mr Ross escorting them through a gathering of CFMEU members and their families. asserted
Ross → let → members
As they walk out on the bridge itself, several people pass them, not just Mr Ross's family. asserted
people → walk → them
After clearing the bridge, the police were then confronted by a group of men as they were trying to walk back the way they came. asserted
they → clear → men
The men argue with them about why they were being kicked off the bridge. asserted
they → argue → bridge
"That's the biggest load of s**t I've ever heard," one of the men told police. asserted
one → hear → police
In response, the officer asked the man to come back and not to be silly. asserted
officer → ask → man
"I'm not being f*****g silly, where can I stand at?" asserted
I → stand → where
After being told by an officer he was acting like a "knob" the man told police, "you are by being a cop". asserted
you → tell → police
All the while, police radio can be heard confirming Riverfire is on hold. asserted
Riverfire → hear → hold
After finally convincing the men to move to a safe spot, the officers give the all-clear for the show to continue. asserted
show → convince → clear
Mr Ross told the Commission of Inquiry the men hassling police were members of the CFMEU and not his friends. asserted
men → tell → CFMEU
He had initially said there were "around 16" people on the site that evening, however based on the vision, counsel assisting that inquiry put that number at closer to 40. asserted
counsel → say → 40
"There's more people than I'd probably prefer there, definitely," Mr Ross said. asserted
Ross → be → ?
After the event, Riverfire organisers emailed BESIX Watpac asking how it was that people were able to be on the bridge and "nearly cause the event to be cancelled". asserted
event → email → bridge
The response from the company's PR firm was that people had got in "through a fence" and had been "moved on" as soon as they were discovered. asserted
they → get → fence
"That's not what happened, is it?" senior counsel assisting the inquiry Eddy Gisonda KC put to Mr Ross. asserted
KC → happen → Ross
"No, it's not," Mr Ross replied. asserted
Ross → reply → ?
Mr Ross was asked if he was "doing the CFMEU a favour" by inviting members onto the site that evening. asserted
he → ask → site
"Two or so weeks beforehand, there had been 70 workers who had walked off the job. asserted
who → walk → job
Did that event have anything to do with you allowing CFMEU members onto the site?" Mr Gisonda asked. asserted
Gisonda → have → site
"Not at all," Mr Ross said. " asserted
Ross → say → ?
I could have rejected their entry … that would've probably done me a dis-favour [sic], but I wasn't trying to seek favour." uncertain
I → reject → favour
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support