Alberta bill would stop provincial entities from considering diversity, equity and inclusion in hiring
Justice legislation also aims to create new consequences for sextortion
New Alberta legislation seeks to stop the provincial government and other public entities from considering diversity, equity and inclusion in hiring decisions.
asserted
legislation → stop → decisions
Justice Minister Mickey Amery tabled legislation Tuesday that would prevent the provincial public service, provincial Crown corporations, publicly funded post-secondary institutions, school boards and municipalities from hiring employees based on “personal characteristics,” according to a government news release.
uncertain
that → table → release
“Hiring decisions should be about who is best qualified for the job, and these changes will help ensure that fairness is at the heart of hiring,” Premier Danielle Smith is quoted as saying in the news release.
asserted
Smith → qualify → release
Amery’s statement in the release says public-sector hiring should be based on merit, qualifications and competence.
asserted
hiring → say → merit
The legislation — the first bill of the fall sitting — proposes to do this by amending the Alberta Human Rights Act so that employers may not consider characteristics protected by the act — such as gender identity, race, religion or disability — in hiring and promotion decisions.
uncertain
employers → propose → decisions
However, the government could grant exemptions in regulations.
uncertain
government → grant → regulations
The amendments would also prevent provincial entities from requiring employees to participate in diversity, equity or inclusion training.
asserted
amendments → prevent → training
Workplace training must be “ideologically neutral and focused on job-related duties and skills,” a briefing note about the proposed amendment says.
asserted
note → focus → amendment
In a technical briefing, officials said the legislation would not prevent post-secondary institutions from tailoring programs for particular students, or reserving spots for those with unchangeable characteristics, such as training for Indigenous teachers, doctors or lawyers.
asserted
legislation → say → teachers
The law would also apply to some private or non-profit organizations that receive government funding.
asserted
that → apply → funding
However, officials said it would be up to the Alberta Human Rights Commission to determine which organizations, and only after someone files a complaint.
asserted
someone → say → complaint
Consequences for threatening sextortion
If passed, Bill 33, the Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2026 (No. 2), would also expand provincial legislation to give victims recourse when someone shares intimate content of them without their consent.
asserted
someone → threaten → consent
The bill would rename and expand the Victims of Non-consensual Distribution of Intimate Images Act to include victims of sextortion, which is when someone threatens to distribute intimate videos, images or other content to blackmail another person.
asserted
someone → rename → person
If passed by the legislature, the amended law would include digitally altered media, such as AI-generated content including deepfakes, and would allow a victim to sue anyone who shares or threatens to share the media without their consent.
asserted
who → pass → consent
It would allow a person to withdraw consent at any time, unless they have signed a legal consent agreement.
asserted
they → allow → agreement
The legislation would create a new provincial offence carrying a fine of up to $10,000, up to two years of jail time, or both.
asserted
legislation → create → time
At the technical briefing, officials said the provincial law is intended to cover what they say are gaps in federal criminal law, and give victims more avenues of recourse.
asserted
they → say → recourse
Officials said a provincial law allowing a victim to sue someone for threatening to share intimate content would be the first of its kind in Canada.
asserted
victim → say → Canada
Federal law, which was updated in June, allows a prison sentence of up to 10 years for distributing or threatening to distribute intimate images, including non-consensual deepfakes, without consent.
asserted
which → update → consent
The bill would also update the Education Act.
asserted
bill → update → Act
For instance, principals have the ability now to suspend or expel a student who shares intimate images of another student without their permission.
asserted
who → have → permission
The amendment would allow them to discipline a student who only threatens to do so, and add sound, video or any other media to the list of possible content.
asserted
who → allow → content
The bill also seeks to make other changes, many of which affect the legal profession, including:
- Reversing some of the United Conservative Party government’s previous changes to give the justice minister additional control over the Alberta Law Foundation.
- Changing the threshold for members of the Law Society of Alberta to call a special meeting to 2.5 per cent of the society’s members from a minimum of 50 members — a rule that dates back to 1966.
- Requiring that a lawyer must have been an active member of the law society for at least five years before government considers granting them a King’s Counsel designation, which recognizes those who have made a significant contribution to the legal profession or public life in the province.
- Allowing lawyers seeking King’s Counsel designations to include their time away from practice in their years of service, to avoid disadvantaging parents.
- Ensuring public bodies disclose all income paid to public sector employees on so-called sunshine lists, when they move from one organization to another.
asserted
they → seek → another
The Public Sector Compensation Transparency Act requires the government to disclose pay, benefits and perks for public service workers earning more than $130,000 in compensation in 2026.
asserted
Act → require → 2026
The Aporia
