India’s ‘balancing act’ risks eroding Russia’s trust

Read the original at The Hindu ↗
Cite

Khan, M. (2026, October 27). India’s ‘balancing act’ risks eroding Russia’s trust. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/indias-balancing-act-risks-eroding-russias-trust/article71632551.ece

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Hindu · collected 2026-10-27 · by Muqtedar Khan

Quick Summary

At recent SCO and BRICS summits in Bishkek and New Delhi, India significantly shifted its stance by endorsing declarations that condemned U.S.-Israeli attacks on Iran and called for an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine. This move, seen as a bid to maintain solidarity with key allies Russia and China, risks straining India's previously balanced approach towards the West and Israel. The article highlights how India's endorsement of strong criticism against Israel marks a departure from its earlier cautious stance on condemning military actions involving these nations.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

India's position at the recent Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, and the BRICS summit in New Delhi shifted dramatically, endorsing a declaration that condemned U.S.-Israeli air strikes on Iran as violations of international law. The declaration also mourned the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in these attacks on February 28, 2026. This move is seen as an attempt by India to maintain its strategic autonomy and avoid alienating key allies like Russia and China ahead of the BRICS summit. Traditionally, the SCO and BRICS summits have been platforms for showcasing mutual solidarity among major powers, but this pivot in India's stance risks eroding trust with Russia due to its conflicting interests in the conflict involving Iran.

Written for “India's Balancing Act With Russia” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 110385 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 India's Balancing Act With Russia
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Hindu
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10 📰 publisher trust 78
“Article A reports on a direct meeting between PM Modi and Putin during the BRICS summit in New Delhi, while Article B discusses India's shifting stance at the SCO and BRICS summits but does not focus on the same specific incident or meeting.”
Nuclear uncertainty different event · 90%
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 12% hedged 2 of 17 📰 publisher trust 72
“The articles discuss different topics related to international relations but do not describe the same specific incident or time frame.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
48
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
7 of 48 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
78/100
The Hindu's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Hindu · 618 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Muqtedar Khan
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 One interpretation of this pivot in policy is that India may have signed on to the declaration to avoid alienating Mr. Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, and thereby jeopardising their attendance at India’s BRICS summit.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

BRICS India Iran Israel SCO

Subjects

India GPE · 18× BRICS ORG · 11× Iran GPE · 10× Israel GPE · 7× SCO ORG · 7× New Delhi GPE · 4× Russia GPE · 4× Ukraine GPE · 4× Washington GPE · 4× Bishkek GPE · 3×

Narrative

First, it endorsed the Bishkek Declaration, which condemned the attacks on Iran as violations of international law, reaffirmed Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and mourned the killing of its Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in U.S.-Israeli air strikes on February 28, 2026.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 One interpretation of this pivot in policy is that India may have signed on to the declaration to avoid alienating Mr. Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, and thereby jeopardising their attendance at India’s BRICS summit.
2026-10-28 · The Hindu
India’s ‘balancing act’ risks eroding Russia’s trust · assertive framing

Claims (48 extracted, 7 hedged)

Iran received considerably more attention and support from members of both the groups, far more than anticipated. asserted
Iran → receive → groups
Traditionally, the SCO and BRICS summits have offered the three major powers — Russia, India and China — an opportunity to demonstrate their mutual solidarity. asserted
summits → offer → solidarity
For Russia, it is a platform from which it can signal to the West that it is not isolated and still has powerful allies. asserted
it → signal → allies
The expansion of the SCO and BRICS under China’s leadership showcases its growing power to the West. asserted
expansion → showcase → West
For India, the SCO and BRICS have been useful for demonstrating its strategic autonomy. asserted
SCO → demonstrate → autonomy
India has sought to remain welcome in both western and non-western forums, from the G-7 to the SCO and BRICS. asserted
India → seek → SCO
At Bishkek, however, India sprang two surprises. asserted
India → spring → surprises
First, it endorsed the Bishkek Declaration, which condemned the attacks on Iran as violations of international law, reaffirmed Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and mourned the killing of its Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in U.S.-Israeli air strikes on February 28, 2026. asserted
which → endorse → February
Although the declaration did not name the U.S. or Israel, its meaning was unmistakable. asserted
meaning → name → U.S.
India reaffirmed its opposition to military strikes on Iran by endorsing the Bishkek Declaration, which condemned the attacks and reiterated support for Iran’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. asserted
which → reaffirm → sovereignty
Second, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made an unusually blunt appeal to Russian President Vladimir Putin to bring Russia’s seemingly endless war in Ukraine to an end. asserted
Modi → make → end
India has generally sought to avoid directly condemning the U.S. or Israel for their military actions against Iran, even though Iran, like India, is a member of both the SCO and BRICS. asserted
Iran → seek → SCO
India had previously avoided explicitly accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza, although it had supported UN resolutions calling for a ceasefire and reaffirmed its commitment to Palestinian statehood. asserted
it → avoid → statehood
Indeed, New Delhi had emphatically declared that it stands with Israel, while often working in multilateral forums to soften language that is critical of Washington and Tel Aviv. asserted
that → declare → Washington
But in both the Bishkek and Delhi Declarations, India signed on to very strong criticism of Israel as well as very strong affirmation of Palestinian rights and the two-state solution. asserted
India → sign → rights
One interpretation of this pivot in policy is that India may have signed on to the declaration to avoid alienating Mr. Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, and thereby jeopardising their attendance at India’s BRICS summit. uncertain
India → sign → summit
Since Operation Sindoor (2025), India has faced a growing perception of diplomatic marginalisation. asserted
India → face → marginalisation
Meanwhile, Pakistan has gained diplomatic prominence through Washington’s selection of Islamabad as a mediator in the conflict with Iran, while several Gulf nations have sought defence agreements with Pakistan. asserted
nations → gain → Pakistan
Consequently, India needed a successful and high-profile BRICS summit, which it got. asserted
it → need → which
While there is a shift in India’s policy, New Delhi has not abandoned Washington entirely. asserted
Delhi → be → Washington
Mr. Modi’s public appeal to Mr. Putin to end the endless war in Ukraine can therefore be read as a counter-signal to Washington. asserted
appeal → end → Washington
Had the message been intended only for Moscow, it could have been conveyed privately. uncertain
it → intend → Moscow
Delivering it publicly suggested that Mr. Modi was also reassuring the West. uncertain
Modi → deliver → West
India may have joined the SCO and BRICS consensus on Iran to secure a successful BRICS summit, but it was now leaning more toward the western position on Ukraine than before. uncertain
it → join → Ukraine
These apparently contradictory shifts reveal the strain on India’s foreign policy. asserted
shifts → reveal → policy
New Delhi wants to support Israel while condemning attacks on Iran; buy Russian oil while aligning more closely with the West on Ukraine; and remain central to BRICS and the SCO while assuring Washington that it is not part of an anti-American bloc. asserted
it → want → bloc
Multi-alignment is becoming an increasingly difficult exercise in this era of change and turbulence. asserted
alignment → become → change
India’s balancing act is unlikely to sit comfortably with either Moscow or Beijing. asserted
act → sit → Moscow
Although Mr. Modi and Mr. Xi did not meet bilaterally at the SCO summit in Bishkek, they held talks on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in New Delhi. asserted
they → meet → Delhi
The meeting preceded Mr. Xi’s high-profile G2 summit with U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, which was held in September 2026. asserted
which → precede → September
Neither summit declaration mentioned the war in Ukraine, avoiding criticism of Moscow even as Mr. Modi publicly urged Mr. Putin to end the conflict. asserted
Modi → mention → conflict
India thus endorsed two declarations accommodating Russia’s position without fully embracing it. asserted
India → endorse → it
From Mr. Putin’s perspective, this was the second time that Mr. Modi had used what might be called ‘jumla’ (performative) diplomacy at Russia’s expense. uncertain
what → use → expense
At Samarkand on September 16, 2022, Mr. Modi told Mr. Putin that “today’s era is not an era of war”. asserted
era → tell → war
External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar subsequently repeated that phrase in western capitals to demonstrate that India’s purchase of discounted Russian oil did not signify political support for Russia’s invasion. asserted
purchase → repeat → invasion
The selectivity of these admonitions is difficult to ignore. asserted
selectivity → ignore → admonitions
Mr. Modi has not used comparable language toward Mr. Netanyahu, even as Israel has attacked several countries and territories across West Asia, many on multiple occasions, and has committed genocide in Gaza. asserted
Israel → use → Gaza
Nor has Mr. Modi publicly directed the same admonition at Mr. Trump following American attacks on Iran. asserted
Modi → direct → Iran
India itself attacked Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. asserted
India → attack → Sindoor
Mr. Putin may therefore conclude that Mr. Modi’s declaration that this is “not an era of war” reflects neither a consistent principle nor a universal opposition to war, but diplomatic messaging designed to reassure the West at Russia’s expense. uncertain
this → conclude → expense
…and 8 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support