Judge's crushing blow to woman who dragged neighbours to the Supreme Court over 3cm of land and rejected a $20k peace offering - and they don't want to speak to her anymore

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Rae, M. (2026, October 27). Judge's crushing blow to woman who dragged neighbours to the Supreme Court over 3cm of land and rejected a $20k peace offering - and they don't want to speak to her anymore. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16228771/Judges-crushing-blow-woman-dragged-neighbours-Supreme-Court-3cm-land-rejected-20k-peace-offering-dont-want-speak-anymore.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-10-27 · by Maisy Rae

Quick Summary

Jian Min Xu, a Sydney nurse, took her neighbors, Royalston and Meredith Martin, to the NSW Supreme Court over a three-centimeter encroachment of their carport onto her property. Despite the Martins offering $20,000 to settle the dispute after removing all identified encroachments by May 2026, Xu demanded $56,649.37 and pursued legal action until July 2025. The Supreme Court judge ruled in favor of the Martins, finding their actions were not unreasonable and ordered both sides to cover their own legal costs.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

A Sydney woman named Jian Min Xu lost her Supreme Court case against her neighbors over a property encroachment of just three centimeters. The dispute began in June 2022 when Ms. Xu hired a surveyor to establish the boundary between her property and that of Royalston and Meredith Martin before building a dividing fence. The Martins' carport had extended about 13 centimeters onto Ms. Xu's land, with other minor encroachments noted. Despite demanding $56,649 in damages and rejecting a $20,000 settlement offer, a Supreme Court judge ruled that the Martins had not acted unreasonably and that Ms. Xu was not entitled to recover her legal costs. The neighbors are now no longer on speaking terms after incurring substantial legal expenses over the years-long conflict.

Written for “Neighbor Land Dispute Rejected” on 2026-10-28, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 110378 · logged 2026-10-28

Story

📰 Neighbor Land Dispute Rejected
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
3 of 26 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
68/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 7872 article(s) · 19 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 19 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Maisy Rae
88 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Almost every Australian would save around $1,000 a year under tax changes proposed by the Greens that would be paid for by collecting 'rivers of gold' from gas and mining companies.
🔮 The One Nation MP said his former wife, Natalie Abberfield, is among more than 12,000 customers whose funds were wiped out after the First Guardian and Shield Master Funds collapsed in May 2024, owing about $1.2billion.
🔮 Former New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern has taken up a post at a major Australian university, where she will mentor students and teach about 'empathetic leadership and social cohesion.
🔮 A report will be prepared for the information of the NSW Coroner.
🔮 Authorities are set to delay the jail release of a convicted paedophile police officer over fears a lynch mob will hunt him down after his new address was leaked online.
🔮 'There may be a separation and now all of a sudden, the woman can take half of the property,' she said.
🔮 The choreographed clip, which was filmed inside a school classroom, was set to the Glee rendition of Dionne Warwick's Say a Little Prayer for You.
🔮 A report will be prepared for the coroner.
🔮 Brendan Nugent, 43, remains in police custody, with detectives expected to formally interview him today.
Also by Maisy Rae
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 88 articles by Maisy Rae →

Topics

NSW Supreme Court Supreme Court Sydney the NSW Supreme Court the Supreme Court

Subjects

Martins PERSON · 4× Meredith Martin PERSON · 3× Royalston PERSON · 3× Sydney GPE · 3× Ian Pike PERSON · 2× Jian Min Xu PERSON · 2× the Daily Mail ORG · 2× Supreme Court ORG · 1× the NSW Supreme Court ORG · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

Frustrated by the perceived lack of action, Ms Xu launched legal proceedings in July 2025 and asked for a court to order the removal of the remaining encroachments. She also sought damages, including aggravated damages, and court orders relating to alleged trespass and interference with her land.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-28
🔮 By May 2026, every identified encroachment had been removed.

Claims (26 extracted, 3 hedged)

A Sydney woman who took her neighbours to the Supreme Court over a carport encroaching just three centimetres onto her property has walked away empty-handed after rejecting a $20,000 offer to settle the bitter dispute. asserted
who → take → dispute
Jian Min Xu, a nurse from Sydney's affluent Lower North Shore, demanded $56,649 from her neighbours after a years-long battle over a tiny strip of land escalated into an extraordinary legal showdown. asserted
battle → demand → showdown
But a Supreme Court judge has found her neighbours had not acted unreasonably, that their encroachments were relatively minor and that Ms Xu is not entitled to recover her legal costs. asserted
Xu → find → costs
And while the battle over the property boundary is finally over, the neighbours are understood to no longer be on speaking terms after racking up huge legal bills. asserted
neighbours → understand → bills
The dispute began in June 2022 when Ms Xu hired a surveyor to establish the boundary between her property and that of her neighbours, Royalston and Meredith Martin, ahead of building a new dividing fence. asserted
Xu → begin → fence
The garage and carport were approximately 42 years old and had been in place for decades before the dispute erupted. asserted
dispute → erupt → decades
The survey revealed the Martins' carport, along with the eave and gutter of their garage, extended about 13 centimetres above her land. asserted
carport → reveal → land
A carport post also crossed the boundary by just three centimetres. asserted
post → cross → centimetres
Jian Min Xu from Sydney took her neighbours to the NSW Supreme Court after discovering their carport encroached by three centimetres onto her land A survey found the carport post encroached onto her property by about three centimetres Ms asserted
post → take → centimetres
Xu raised the issue with her neighbours in September 2023 and asked for the offending structures to be removed. However, almost two years later, the work had not been completed, with conflicting surveys and a tradie taking out the wrong carport post, contributing to the delay. asserted
surveys → raise → delay
Frustrated by the perceived lack of action, Ms Xu launched legal proceedings in July 2025 and asked for a court to order the removal of the remaining encroachments. She also sought damages, including aggravated damages, and court orders relating to alleged trespass and interference with her land. asserted
She → frustrate → land
A further survey commissioned by Ms Xu identified additional encroachments of between one and three centimetres. asserted
survey → commission → centimetres
Rather than fight over the conflicting survey findings, the Martins agreed to remove the structures. asserted
Martins → fight → structures
By May 2026, every identified encroachment had been removed. uncertain
encroachment → identify → May
The following month, Ms Xu demanded $56,649.37 to settle her claim. uncertain
Xu → demand → claim
NSW Supreme Court Justice Ian Pike found there was no evidence of unreasonable conduct from her neighbours - Royalston and Meredith Martin Her neighbours refused, instead offering her $20,000 to bring the proceedings to an end. Ms Xu rejected the offer. asserted
Xu → find → offer
In a judgment handed down last week, Justice Ian Pike ordered both sides to pay their own legal costs after finding there was no evidence the Martins had acted unreasonably. asserted
Martins → hand → costs
'The alleged encroachments relate to structures which have been in place since 1984,' he said. asserted
he → allege → 1984
'The boundary determination found that there were some encroachments, although it must be observed that they were of a relevantly minor nature. asserted
they → find → nature
The judge found the structures had not seriously affected Ms Xu's ability to use or enjoy her property, although they could have interfered with her plans to build a dividing fence. uncertain
they → find → fence
He also rejected suggestions her neighbours had deliberately dragged their feet over removing the structures. asserted
neighbours → reject → structures
'At no stage did the defendants indicate that they would not remove the encroachments. asserted
they → indicate → encroachments
I do not regard the time taken as indicating any implicit refusal to do the work,' he said. asserted
he → regard → work
Justice Pike acknowledged Ms Xu's frustration over the delays but found there was no basis for concluding the Martins had abandoned their commitment to remove the encroachments. asserted
Martins → acknowledge → encroachments
Ms Xu told the Daily Mail last week she was disappointed by the decision and was considering an appeal. asserted
she → tell → appeal
The Daily Mail has contacted Royalston and Meredith Martin for comment. asserted
Mail → contact → comment
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support