Child protection 'informally' removed SA children against mothers' wishes

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
Cite

Richards, S. (2026, October 26). Child protection 'informally' removed SA children against mothers' wishes. ABC News (AU). https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-10-27/informal-removal-of-sa-children-against-mums-wishes/107310402

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-10-26 · by Stephanie Richards

Quick Summary

South Australia’s Ombudsman released a report revealing that child protection workers made administrative errors by placing three children in family members' care against their mothers’ wishes without using formal statutory powers. The department acted inconsistently with its own policy, which requires collaboration and agreement with parents, guardians, and caregivers. Emily Strickland, the Ombudsman, noted serious safety concerns but criticized the lack of adherence to proper procedures and parental consent in each case.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of 2026-10-26, South Australia's Ombudsman Emily Strickland released a report revealing that three South Australian children were placed in the care of family members against their mothers' wishes due to administrative errors by child protection workers. The Department for Child Protection removed these children informally without exercising formal statutory powers, despite clear internal policies requiring genuine collaboration with parents and guardians. Ms. Strickland noted that in each case, the department disregarded the persistent disagreement of one parent, which was inconsistent with their own policy guidelines aimed at ensuring safety through family partnerships rather than formal intervention. The Department for Child Protection has stated it welcomes the Ombudsman's report and is implementing recommendations to address these issues.

Written for “Child Protection Controversy In SA” on 2026-10-26, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.25, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 1 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 108681: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-26

Story

📰 Child Protection Controversy In SA
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
22
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
2 of 22 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
68/100
ABC News (AU)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 4029 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Stephanie Richards
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 He said safety plans were regularly developed in partnership with families to "implement short-term protective measures to keep a child or young person safe", including where they could be safely cared for by family members without the need for formal intervention.
🔮 "[They could possibly be] killed in a situation if the track itself is not adequate to a Grade A safety standard in the FIM (Fédération Internationale de Motocyclisme).
🔮 So much has already been written, said and speculated about what may or may not have happened to Gus Lamont.
🔮 In years following the first complaint, the problem worsened, and the ombudsman found the contamination would not meet minimum housing standards.
🔮 Based on current trends, it would take another 21 years for Australia's Indigenous population to reach pre-colonisation numbers.
Also by Stephanie Richards
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Children and Young People (Safety) Act Ombudsman South Australian The Department for Child Protection the SA Department for Child Protection

Subjects

Strickland PERSON · 6× Ombudsman ORG · 2× South Australian NORP · 2× Darian Shephard-Bayly PERSON · 1× Emily Strickland PERSON · 1× The Department for Child Protection ORG · 1× the Department for Child Protection's ORG · 1× the SA Department for Child Protection ORG · 1×

Narrative

"In each matter, the department appeared to have disregarded the clear and persistent disagreement of one of the parents," Ms Strickland stated. "This was inconsistent with clear internal policy that required genuine collaboration and agreement with parents, guardians and caregivers." In her report, Ms Strickland noted the department was responding to "serious concerns" for the children's safety and wellbeing.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-26
🔮 He said safety plans were regularly developed in partnership with families to "implement short-term protective measures to keep a child or young person safe", including where they could be safely cared for by family members without the need for formal intervention.
2026-10-26 · ABC News (AU)
Child protection 'informally' removed SA children against mothers' wishes · assertive framing

Claims (22 extracted, 2 hedged)

In short: A report by SA's Ombudsman has found that three South Australian children were placed in the care of family members contrary to their mothers' wishes. asserted
children → find → wishes
The report found the child protection workers responsible acted in error. The Department for Child Protection says it welcomes the Ombudsman's report and that the agency has taken steps to implement recommendations. asserted
agency → find → recommendations
Child protection workers acted in error when they "informally" placed three South Australian children in the care of family members, against their mothers' wishes, the state's Ombudsman has found. asserted
Ombudsman → act → wishes
In a report released this month following an investigation into three separate complaints, Ombudsman Emily Strickland found the SA Department for Child Protection removed the children without exercising formal statutory powers. asserted
Department → release → powers
She wrote the department's approach to removing each child involved "administrative error". asserted
approach → write → error
"In each matter, the department appeared to have disregarded the clear and persistent disagreement of one of the parents," Ms Strickland stated. "This was inconsistent with clear internal policy that required genuine collaboration and agreement with parents, guardians and caregivers." In her report, Ms Strickland noted the department was responding to "serious concerns" for the children's safety and wellbeing. asserted
department → appear → safety
She stated the department used "safety plans" to place two of the children in the care of another parent or close family member. asserted
department → state → parent
According to Ms Strickland, safety plans are ordinarily "collaborative" agreements between a child's parents or caregivers and the department. uncertain
plans → accord → parents
Where agreement cannot be reached, the department must consider alternative approaches to addressing safety concerns, including formal statutory removals under SA's Children and Young People (Safety) Act. asserted
department → reach → Act
"In the two cases involving safety plans, the mothers clearly and consistently disagreed to the proposed plans," Ms Strickland wrote. asserted
Strickland → involve → plans
"Despite this disagreement, the department did not exercise formal powers of removal and instead adopted the safety plans either with the child's other parent or with other family members." asserted
department → exercise → members
In the third case, Ms Strickland found the department removed an infant from their mother and placed them in the care of their father without the use of a safety plan or statutory removal powers. asserted
department → find → plan
She wrote the department held "serious concerns" for the mother's mental health at the time. " asserted
department → write → time
The mother also clearly disagreed with the proposal that her child be placed in their father's care," she wrote. asserted
she → disagree → care
"Although she eventually reluctantly agreed, the Ombudsman did not consider it open for the department to have sought that agreement to effect a removal without the use of its formal powers." asserted
department → agree → powers
Ms Strickland wrote that for each case, there were "explicit expectations" in the department's policies for how the department ought to have engaged with the parents. asserted
department → write → parents
"The expectations for genuine engagement and independent support were not met," she wrote. " asserted
she → meet → engagement
Each matter under investigation culminated in the department informally altering the care arrangements of a child without agreement from the parent from whose care the child was removed." asserted
child → culminate → parent
In a statement, the Department for Child Protection's Acting Chief Executive Darian Shephard-Bayly welcomed the Ombudsman's report and said the agency had taken steps to implement recommendations, including updating its manual of practice on the use of safety plans. asserted
agency → welcome → plans
He said safety plans were regularly developed in partnership with families to "implement short-term protective measures to keep a child or young person safe", including where they could be safely cared for by family members without the need for formal intervention. uncertain
they → say → intervention
"Keeping children safely connected to their families, communities and culture remains a priority," the statement read. asserted
statement → keep → families
"The department and government and non-government partners work with families to address child protection concerns wherever possible to prevent children entering care." asserted
children → work → care
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support