The Aporia
The Canadian Press. (2026, October 26). Crown withdraws criminal charges against Pro-Palestinian protesters arrested at Montreal sit-in. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-palestinian-protesters-montreal-scotiabank-charges-withdrawn-fines/
The Canadian Press. “Crown withdraws criminal charges against Pro-Palestinian protesters arrested at Montreal sit-in.” The Globe and Mail, 26 Oct. 2026, https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-palestinian-protesters-montreal-scotiabank-charges-withdrawn-fines/.
The Canadian Press. “Crown withdraws criminal charges against Pro-Palestinian protesters arrested at Montreal sit-in.” The Globe and Mail, October 26, 2026. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-palestinian-protesters-montreal-scotiabank-charges-withdrawn-fines/.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
As of October 26, 2026, the Crown withdrew all criminal charges against 44 pro-Palestinian protesters who were arrested in April 2024 during a sit-in at a Scotiabank branch in downtown Montreal. The protesters had demanded that the bank divest from Elbit Systems, an Israeli weapons manufacturer. Fourteen of them had already pleaded guilty to violating a municipal noise bylaw and paid $300 fines. Most others resolved their cases through community service. The case concluded shortly after Scotiabank sold its remaining shares in Elbit Systems, which the protesters celebrated as a victory. However, they have filed a complaint against the judge overseeing their case, alleging bias and unfair treatment. Defence lawyer Barbara Bedont warned that criminalizing peaceful sit-ins threatens the right to protest.
The Crown has withdrawn all criminal charges against pro-Palestinian protesters arrested during a sit-in at a downtown Montreal bank more than two years ago.
The 44 protesters were arrested in April, 2024, at a Scotiabank branch, where they demanded that the bank divest from Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit Systems.
The protesters say they have filed a complaint against the judge who oversaw their case, alleging bias and unfair treatment during the proceedings.