Endangered turtles and ‘exceptional’ coral at risk from Woodside’s gas drilling in WA, watchdog says

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Milne, P. (2026, October 26). Endangered turtles and ‘exceptional’ coral at risk from Woodside’s gas drilling in WA, watchdog says. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/oct/27/endangered-turtles-and-exceptional-coral-at-risk-from-woodsides-gas-drilling-in-wa-watchdog-says

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-26 · by Peter Milne

Quick Summary

Woodside Energy’s plan to drill for gas off Western Australia's northwest coast faces significant environmental risks, according to a draft letter from WA’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) obtained by the Guardian in 2023. The EPA criticized Woodside’s proposal, stating that protecting endangered species like turtles and blue whales near Scott Reef would be ineffective and that it may not be possible to reduce oil spill risk adequately. This assessment could lead to a rejection of Woodside's development plans for Australia's largest undeveloped gas reserve in the Browse basin.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Summary unavailable.

Written for “Endangered Species At Risk From Drilling” on 2026-10-26, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 107972 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-10-26

Story

📰 Endangered Species At Risk From Drilling
Environment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
7 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Environment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2481 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Peter Milne
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Woodside Energy’s plan to drill for gas off Western Australia’s north-west coast could significantly damage “exceptional” coral reefs and it may be impossible to reduce the risk of an oil spill to an acceptable level, according to advice from the state’s independent environmental watchdog.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Australia EPA Western Australia’s Woodside Woodside Energy’s

Subjects

Woodside ORG · 8× EPA ORG · 7× Australia GPE · 3× Chevron ORG · 1× Environmental Protection Authority ORG · 1× Guardian ORG · 1× Timor GPE · 1× Western Australia’s GPE · 1× Woodside Energy’s ORG · 1×

Narrative

Glenn Walker, Greenpeace head of nature, said Woodside’s plans to address the concerns raised by the EPA did not go far enough and relied on “fanciful and unproven technology” to prevent a catastrophic oil spill. “It would be a major backflip for both the WA EPA and the national EPA to now recommend approving this project,” he said.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-26
🔮 Woodside Energy’s plan to drill for gas off Western Australia’s north-west coast could significantly damage “exceptional” coral reefs and it may be impossible to reduce the risk of an oil spill to an acceptable level, according to advice from the state’s independent environmental watchdog.

Claims (39 extracted, 7 hedged)

Woodside Energy’s plan to drill for gas off Western Australia’s north-west coast could significantly damage “exceptional” coral reefs and it may be impossible to reduce the risk of an oil spill to an acceptable level, according to advice from the state’s independent environmental watchdog. uncertain
it → drill → watchdog
A draft letter from WA’s Environmental Protection Authority written in 2023, seen by the Guardian, sharply criticised Woodside’s proposal to develop the Browse gasfield, saying its plans to protect endangered turtles and blue whales near Scott Reef would be ineffective. asserted
plans → write → Reef
Woodside, Australia’s largest fossil fuel company, is hoping to win approval next year to develop the Browse basin, about 300km off the Kimberley coast. asserted
Woodside → hop → coast
Scientists have warned it could damage the Scott Reef ecosystem, which is home to more than 1,500 species, many unique to the area. uncertain
which → warn → area
EPA staff presented the draft letter to the authority’s board for approval in December 2023. asserted
staff → present → December
In February 2024, two months after it was discussed, the EPA sent a letter to Woodside saying its preliminary view was to reject development of the vast gas reserve. asserted
view → discuss → reserve
It was a significant setback to Woodside’s plan to drill more than 50 wells and pipe the gas 1,000km to its ageing North West Shelf gas export plant adjacent to the world heritage-listed Murujuga rock art. asserted
It → drill → art
The company won approval last year to run the North West Shelf until 2070. asserted
company → win → 2070
But it needs the gas from the Browse basin – Australia’s largest undeveloped source of gas – to feed it. asserted
gas → need → it
If the processing plant was to operate until 2070 it could lead to about 88m tonnes of carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere each year after the gas was burned. uncertain
gas → operate → atmosphere
The concerns presented in the letter to the EPA board show the pressure on authorities to recommend against the gasfield development being approved. asserted
development → present → authorities
The development is being assessed by both the state and commonwealth EPAs. asserted
development → assess → EPAs
Ultimate decision-making power lies with environment ministers. asserted
power → make → ministers
The letter shows the EPA board was advised by its staff that there was a threat of serious or irreversible harm to turtles and whales and more generally due to oil spills. asserted
board → show → spills
The threats were considered serious enough that the staff said the precautionary principle should be invoked. asserted
principle → consider → ?
It meant the EPA should assume the worst possible outcomes could occur. uncertain
outcomes → mean → ?
In response to this near rejection of its proposal, Woodside added explosive-driven shear rams to its drilling plans, a step that could allow it to seal a leaking well in seconds. uncertain
it → add → seconds
The company said this would reduce the “longest credible duration” of a “highly unlikely” well blowout, and potential oil spill, to about 12 hours. asserted
this → say → hours
Not all companies have faith in shear ram technology. asserted
companies → have → technology
In 2024, fellow WA gas exporter Chevron rejected “pyrotechnic shearing” technology for its own wells, describing it as unproven and impossible to test in the field. asserted
Chevron → reject → field
A Woodside spokesperson said if the shear rams failed it would deploy a capping stack to stop the oil flow within 16 days. asserted
it → say → days
But the EPA was advised in 2023 that if a well leaked for 13 days it was possible there could be “irreversible consequences” to Scott Reef. uncertain
it → advise → Reef
The draft letter said Sandy Islet, a part of Scott Reef considered critical to the survival of endangered green turtles, would be threatened if the seabed subsided after Woodside extracted gas from beneath it. asserted
Woodside → say → it
It said a proposal to top up the sand on the islet, where about 1,000 turtles breed each year, was a “high-risk” measure and its success was “likely to be limited”. asserted
success → say → islet
Woodside said it would address this by changing its plans so that no wells would be drilled within 20km of Sandy Islet. asserted
wells → say → Islet
It also said the flaring of gas, which produces bright light that can confuse turtle’s navigation, would be restricted. asserted
that → say → navigation
The EPA board was also told noise, traffic and vessel strikes would have a significant impact on pygmy blue whales migrating between Timor and southern Australia. asserted
strikes → tell → Timor
Scott Reef is the only known whale feeding ground on the migration route, according to the draft letter. uncertain
Reef → accord → letter
Woodside’s spokesperson said the company understood whales did feed at Scott Reef, but that this was opportunistic and the area was not as important as the ocean off Perth and other areas further south. asserted
area → say → Perth
Woodside agreed that Scott Reef and Sandy Islet had exceptional environmental value and it was important to protect them for future generations. asserted
it → agree → generations
Glenn Walker, Greenpeace head of nature, said Woodside’s plans to address the concerns raised by the EPA did not go far enough and relied on “fanciful and unproven technology” to prevent a catastrophic oil spill. “It would be a major backflip for both the WA EPA and the national EPA to now recommend approving this project,” he said. asserted
he → say → project
“It is now critical that these regulators maintain their independence from corporate and political influence and reject this destructive project.” asserted
regulators → maintain → project
Greenpeace last week nominated Scott Reef for national heritage listing based on its ecological and scientific values. asserted
Greenpeace → nominate → values
Just two of the current nine-strong WA EPA board were in place when the watchdog told Woodside it was set to reject Browse. asserted
it → tell → Browse
One of those – the current chair, Darren Walsh – said in a statement the assessment had been lengthy because it was a complex project in a sensitive area. asserted
it → say → area
He said a final state report and recommendations on the proposal would be provided to the WA environment minister, Matthew Swinbourn, when it was complete. asserted
it → say → minister
There would then be a three-week public appeal period before a decision was made. asserted
decision → make → ?
A spokesperson for the national EPA said the development was being assessed under the national Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, and the “decision clock” had been paused while the agency waited on “further technical advice”. asserted
agency → say → advice
Issues that have to be considered under national law include the potential impact on pygmy blue whales, green turtles, the marine environment in commonwealth waters and Murujuga rock art near the gas processing facility. asserted
that → have → facility
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support