Elvis Presley’s rights holders sue Anthropic saying it trained AI on his music

Read the original at NBC News ↗
Cite

Mullen, A. (2026, October 25). Elvis Presley’s rights holders sue Anthropic saying it trained AI on his music. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/elvis-presleys-rights-holders-sue-anthropic-saying-trained-ai-music-rcna605551

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

NBC News · collected 2026-10-25 · by Austin Mullen

Quick Summary

Elvis Presley’s music rights holders, including Authentic Brands Group and other entities controlling his intellectual property, have filed a lawsuit against Anthropic for allegedly using 274 of Elvis’s copyrighted songs without permission or payment during the development of its AI model Claude. The plaintiffs claim this includes famous hits like “All Shook Up” and “Can’t Help Falling in Love,” accusing Anthropic of infringing copyrights throughout the development process and continuing to do so as users generate song reproductions and adaptations. This lawsuit is part of a broader trend of legal action against AI companies for copyright infringement involving music and other content.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Authentic Brands Group, which controls Elvis Presley's intellectual property along with other companies, trusts, and individuals who own rights to his music, has filed a lawsuit against Anthropic. The suit alleges that Anthropic used 274 copyrighted songs by Presley without permission or payment to train its AI models, including the flagship Claude system. These include famous hits like "All Shook Up," "Can't Help Falling in Love," and "Don't Be Cruel." The plaintiffs are seeking $41.1 million in statutory copyright damages, up to $150,000 for each of the 274 works allegedly infringed upon.

Written for “Elvis Presley Rights Lawsuit” on 2026-10-26, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 106322 · logged 2026-10-26

Story

📰 Elvis Presley Rights Lawsuit
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
19
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
21%
4 of 19 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
95/100
NBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

NBC News · 1739 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Austin Mullen
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Presley’s rights holders are seeking $41.1 million in statutory copyright damages — up to $150,000 for each of the 274 works they alleged were willfully infringed — according to the complaint.
Also by Austin Mullen
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American Anthropic Authentic Brands Group Claude Presley

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 11× Presley PERSON · 7× Claude PERSON · 3× Elvis PERSON · 2× American NORP · 1× Authentic Brands Group ORG · 1× Concord Music Group ORG · 1× Elvis Presley’s PERSON · 1× Richard Busch PERSON · 1× Universal Music ORG · 1×

Narrative

In a lawsuit filed Friday, Authentic Brands Group, the licensing platform that controls Presley’s intellectual property — along with other companies, trusts and individuals who own rights to his music — accused Anthropic of infringing copyrights to 274 songs without any license or payment.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-26
🔮 Presley’s rights holders are seeking $41.1 million in statutory copyright damages — up to $150,000 for each of the 274 works they alleged were willfully infringed — according to the complaint.

Claims (19 extracted, 4 hedged)

The owners of Elvis Presley’s music have sued Anthropic for allegedly using his copyrighted lyrics without permission to train its AI models and generating infringing versions of his songs. uncertain
owners → sue → songs
In a lawsuit filed Friday, Authentic Brands Group, the licensing platform that controls Presley’s intellectual property — along with other companies, trusts and individuals who own rights to his music — accused Anthropic of infringing copyrights to 274 songs without any license or payment. asserted
who → file → license
These span some of Presley’s biggest hits, including “All Shook Up,” “Can’t Help Falling in Love,” “Don’t Be Cruel,” “A Little Less Conversation” and “Return to Sender.” asserted
These → span → Sender
“The Elvis Plaintiffs’ iconic collective catalog contains some of the most groundbreaking, revolutionary, influential, and enduring musical compositions in human history,” the lawsuit stated. asserted
lawsuit → contain → history
The plaintiffs allege that the infringement has occurred throughout “the entire development” of Anthropic’s flagship Claude models and continues today as users generate outputs that reproduce copyrighted lyrics or create unauthorized adaptations of the songs. asserted
that → allege → songs
“As we say in the lawsuit, the Elvis Plaintiffs are guardians of, and highly protective of, Elvis’s song which are some of the most iconic of all time,” attorney Richard Busch wrote in a statement. asserted
Busch → say → statement
A spokesperson for Anthropic wrote: “We disagree with the claims and intend to defend this case fully.” uncertain
We → write → case
The complaint further describes Anthropic as having “built its entire business model on infringing copyrights at an unfathomable scale,” pointing to the alleged mass scraping of internet content and pirating of books to develop its Claude language models. asserted
complaint → describe → models
Last year, Anthropic agreed to a landmark $1.5 billion settlement in a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by authors who alleged the company had illegally used pirated copies of their books to train AI models. asserted
company → agree → models
The lawsuit by Presley’s rights holders comes amid a larger wave of lawsuits against Anthropic and other AI companies for allegedly using copyrighted musical works without consent or compensation. uncertain
lawsuit → come → consent
In January, Universal Music, Concord Music Group and ABKCO Music expanded their lawsuit against Anthropic over the alleged infringement of copyrighted song lyrics. asserted
Music → expand → lyrics
BMG Rights Management, Sony Music Publishing and Warner Chappell Music filed similar lawsuits against Anthropic this year. asserted
Management → file → Anthropic
Anthropic and the AI music generation company Suno were also recently hit with lawsuits from the independent music publisher Round Hill — which is represented by Busch, the lead attorney for Presley’s rights holders — and the independent music company Reservoir Media. asserted
which → hit → holders
“Even after the Defendant supposedly put up ‘guardrails’ after being sued, in one of its latest iterations, Claude continues to infringe,” the Presley rights holders state in their lawsuit. asserted
holders → put → lawsuit
The complaint notes that when asked recently to re-create specific songs “for a modern audience,” Claude did so. asserted
Claude → note → audience
“These renders keep landing very close to the originals: same structure, same hooks reused with light rewording, and full sets of verses/choruses/bridges,” the complaint said. asserted
complaint → keep → bridges
“That’s edging past ‘inspired by’ into reproducing the copyrighted song, even when the words are swapped out.” asserted
words → edge → song
Presley’s rights holders are seeking $41.1 million in statutory copyright damages — up to $150,000 for each of the 274 works they alleged were willfully infringed — according to the complaint. uncertain
they → seek → complaint
They also demand a permanent injunction to prevent Anthropic from “further infringing” on Presley’s works and an order for the company to destroy all unauthorized copies of the copyrighted works. asserted
company → demand → works
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support