Lucy Letby’s lawyer insists case has not been undermined after experts quit

Evening Standard · collected 2026-09-15 · by Jessica Coates
Read the original at Evening Standard ↗

Summary

Lucy Letby’s lawyer asserts that her case remains strong despite two experts quitting her defense team, citing unresolved issues with some legal arguments. The former nurse is serving multiple life sentences for killing seven infants and attempting to murder seven others at the Countess of Chester hospital. Engineering expert Helen Shannon and bioengineering professor Geoff Chase withdrew from representing Letby’s case after expressing concerns about certain scientifically unsupported claims made by her defense team, but they still maintain that their previous report on two specific cases remains valid.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-15, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
7%
1 of 15 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
71.1
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
unclustered
not grouped into a story yet
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.30 Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning score -0.30 for article 10470 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-15

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

Evening Standard · 539 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)
2026-09-16
Chelsea injury update: Joao Pedro, Reece James, Moises Caicedo latest news and return dates
2026-09-11
Liverpool injury update: Bradley Barcola, Cody Gakpo, Milos Kerkez latest news and return dates
2026-09-10
Chelsea injury update: Levi Colwill, Moises Caicedo and Marco Palestra latest updates and return dates

Who wrote this

Jessica Coates
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 So how on earth could they make that conclusion?” he said.
🔮 The skit saw Hargitay reprise her Law And Order: SVU and ceremony role as Olivia Benson as her team of SVU detectives investigated whether Swift would attend the ceremony.
🔮 Separately, National Rail said pre-planned engineering work between London Paddington and Burnham would close some lines on Sunday morning, with all lines between London Paddington and Ealing Broadway closed early in the morning.
Also by Jessica Coates
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

CCRC The Criminal Cases Review Commission The Guardian

Subjects

CCRC ORG · 4× Letby PERSON · 4× Geoff Chase PERSON · 1× Helen Shannon PERSON · 1× Lucy Letby PERSON · 1× Lucy Letby’s PERSON · 1× The Criminal Cases Review Commission ORG · 1× The Guardian ORG · 1×

Narrative

The letter added: “Whilst it is entirely legitimate for the defence to advance multiple arguments, some of the other arguments now being put forward we cannot support as scientifically credible and which have, in our view, fundamental unresolvable problems.” Letby was denied permission to appeal against her convictions in 2024. The findings of a public inquiry into how she was able to repeatedly kill and harm babies on the hospital’s neonatal unit are due to be published on Tuesday.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 So how on earth could they make that conclusion?” he said.
2026-09-15 · Evening Standard
Lucy Letby’s lawyer insists case has not been undermined after experts quit · assertive framing

Claims (15 extracted, 1 hedged)

Lucy Letby’s lawyer has insisted her case has not been undermined after two experts quit her defence team, saying some of its arguments have “unresolvable problems”. asserted
some → insist → problems
The former nurse, who maintains her innocence, is serving 15 whole-life terms for the murders of seven babies and the attempted murders of seven others while working on the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester hospital. asserted
who → maintain → hospital
Engineering expert Helen Shannon and bioengineering professor Geoff Chase withdrew from the team on Monday. asserted
Shannon → withdraw → Monday
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, is considering evidence presented on her behalf by an international panel of medics. asserted
which → investigate → medics
Read More The group argued the babies died or collapsed as a result of poor medical care and natural causes. asserted
babies → read → care
“They don’t know what I put into the CCRC because I haven’t told them. asserted
I → know → them
So how on earth could they make that conclusion?” he said. uncertain
he → make → conclusion
“But really, it comes back to this. asserted
it → come → this
Both sets of experts say that Lucy Letby is innocent. asserted
Letby → say → experts
“One set of experts remains in the CCRC. asserted
set → remain → CCRC
One set of experts have withdrawn. asserted
set → withdraw → experts
But they both are of the same position that whatever happened at the trial, what took place at the trial, was wrong, that the jury was misled.” asserted
jury → happen → trial
In a letter to the CCRC and reported by The Guardian, the two experts raised concerns about legal arguments put forward by Letby’s team, adding that it was “placing the long-term interests of Ms Letby at serious, unnecessary and unacceptable risk”. asserted
it → report → risk
The pair continued to back their report on Letby’s convictions for attempting to murder two babies with insulin, maintaining it was “very unlikely” they had been poisoned. asserted
they → continue → insulin
The letter added: “Whilst it is entirely legitimate for the defence to advance multiple arguments, some of the other arguments now being put forward we cannot support as scientifically credible and which have, in our view, fundamental unresolvable problems.” Letby was denied permission to appeal against her convictions in 2024. The findings of a public inquiry into how she was able to repeatedly kill and harm babies on the hospital’s neonatal unit are due to be published on Tuesday. asserted
she → add → Tuesday
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support