Brewers can’t stop thinking about LA: ‘The Dodgers were the lucky team last season’

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Martinez, V. (2026, October 24). Brewers can’t stop thinking about LA: ‘The Dodgers were the lucky team last season’. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/23/sports/brewers-cant-stop-thinking-about-la-the-dodgers-were-the-lucky-team-last-season/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-24 · by Valentina Martinez

Quick Summary

Milwaukee Brewers catcher William Contreras has written a letter to fans discussing the team’s playoff series against the Los Angeles Dodgers from last season, where Milwaukee was swept by LA. In his letter published on The Players Tribune, Contreras asserts that while acknowledging the Dodgers’ overall talent, he believes they were merely lucky in sweeping the Brewers. This sentiment echoes comments made previously by manager Pat Murphy and owner Mark Attanasio, highlighting how ongoing references to the Dodgers are becoming a distraction for the Brewers as they aim to win their first World Series title this year.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-24, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Milwaukee Brewers have reached the World Series after sweeping the Los Angeles Dodgers in the National League Championship Series (NLCS). Manager Pat Murphy and owner Mark Attanasio previously criticized the Dodgers, and recently, catcher William Contreras echoed similar sentiments. In an article for The Players Tribune, Contreras noted that while the Dodgers were a strong team overall, they had "lucky" moments during their sweep of the Brewers in the previous season's NLCS. Contreras emphasized his unique perspective as he played against the Dodgers from both sides of the plate and believes the Brewers deserved more belief despite being swept. These ongoing comments have become a distraction to the Brewers' success on the field.

Written for “Dodgers Good Luck Last Season” on 2026-10-24, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 103340 · logged 2026-10-24

Story

📰 Dodgers Good Luck Last Season
Sports · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 3 of 38 📰 publisher trust 66
“While both articles discuss the Brewers' World Series run, Article A is about the general setup and characteristics of the current World Series between Milwaukee and Tampa Bay, while Article B focuses on the Brewers' recent series against the Dodgers from the previous season.”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 2 of 44 📰 publisher trust 74
“Article A discusses the general context of the World Series between the Brewers and Rays, while Article B focuses on the Brewers' mindset regarding their past loss to the Dodgers.”
Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 43 📰 publisher trust 67
“While both articles discuss the Milwaukee Brewers' victory over the Los Angeles Dodgers in the NLCS and subsequent commentary by the Brewers about the series, they describe different aspects of the broader event and are not reporting on a single specific incident.”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 2 of 14 📰 publisher trust 66
“While both articles discuss comments made by the Brewers about the Dodgers, they refer to different occasions and outcomes.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
21
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 21 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 13439 article(s) · 34 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 34 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Valentina Martinez
118 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The results of the federal probe, however, could have implications for the back-to-back World Series champions.
🔮 Since then, Brewers owner Mark Attanasio has also thrown shade at the juggernaut and catcher William Contreras is the latest to mention the eliminated Dodgers.
🔮 If we had not won that Game 4, we would’ve seen Skubal and [Yoshinobu Yamamoto] again, and we could’ve been looking at Game 7.
🔮 Then you need the King Blocker 9000, advanced technology that will mute any mention of (LeBron James).”
🔮 It appears Kanter will be in attendance for Game 3, which is surely to be a point of contention for some players and fans.
🔮 Reese, who was ranked the top player in the Finals by ESPN, will get another chance to dominate in all four quarters in Game 2 against Golden State on Monday.
🔮 “In my opinion, there were some pitch selections — I don’t know if it came from Will Smith or it was the pitcher himself — and they put the Milwaukee Brewers in a position to flex their muscles when the Dodgers should have been flexing theirs.
🔮 Kiké Hernandez may have played his final game with the Dodgers.
🔮 The Dodgers, who face an uncertain future after the failed quest for a three-peat, will need Tucker to play at All-Star strength the entire 2027 season as one of the many veterans on the roster.
🔮 Their performance has been anything but impressive, however, a win over the Chiefs ahead of the bye week would surely help the low morale in the Chargers’ building.
Also by Valentina Martinez
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 118 articles by Valentina Martinez →

Topics

Brewers Dodgers Milwaukee World Series the National League Championship Series

Subjects

Dodgers ORG · 10× Brewers ORG · 6× Contreras PERSON · 3× Milwaukee ORG · 2× Mark Attanasio PERSON · 1× Pat Murphy PERSON · 1× The Players Tribune ORG · 1× William Contreras PERSON · 1× the National League’s ORG · 1×

Narrative

While Contreras continues to express his belief in the National League’s best team, the ongoing comments surrounding the Dodgers have become a distraction to the Brewers’ success.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-24
🔮 Since then, Brewers owner Mark Attanasio has also thrown shade at the juggernaut and catcher William Contreras is the latest to mention the eliminated Dodgers.

Claims (21 extracted, 0 hedged)

The Brewers have reached baseball’s biggest stage, but haven’t stopped talking about the Dodgers. asserted
Brewers → reach → Dodgers
After Milwaukee swept the back-to-back World Series champions in the National League Championship Series, manager Pat Murphy took a jab at the Dodgers. asserted
Murphy → sweep → Dodgers
Since then, Brewers owner Mark Attanasio has also thrown shade at the juggernaut and catcher William Contreras is the latest to mention the eliminated Dodgers. asserted
Contreras → throw → Dodgers
Contreras penned a letter to fans in The Players Tribune and discussed the 2025 postseason where the Brewers were swept by the Dodgers. asserted
Brewers → pen → Dodgers
“The playoff series against the Dodgers, we got swept…… asserted
we → sweep → Dodgers
It was terrible,” Contreras wrote. asserted
Contreras → write → ?
“I understand why there was not so much belief in us after a loss like that. asserted
I → understand → that
But if you want the truth, I’ll tell you, because I was there. asserted
I → want → you
I’m the one who saw it from both sides, right? asserted
who → ’m → sides
I’m behind the plate for their side … and I’m at the plate for our side. asserted
I → ’m → side
“Here’s the truth: The Dodgers were the lucky team last season. asserted
Dodgers → ’ → ?
“No, I’m not saying they were lucky to be champions. asserted
they → say → ?
It’s a tremendous team, with tremendous players. asserted
It → ’ → players
I’ll take nothing away from them. asserted
I → take → them
But were they lucky to SWEEP us? asserted
they → sweep → us
That’s a different story.” asserted
That → ’ → ?
While Contreras continues to express his belief in the National League’s best team, the ongoing comments surrounding the Dodgers have become a distraction to the Brewers’ success. asserted
comments → continue → success
Yes, the Dodgers fell short of their ultimate goal. asserted
Dodgers → fall → goal
Yes, the Brewers played far better baseball than LA in the NLCS. asserted
Brewers → play → NLCS
But to continue mentioning the Dodgers only takes away from what Milwaukee can achieve with only four more wins. asserted
Milwaukee → continue → wins
The Brewers have the chance to take home its first World Series title in franchise history, but defeating the Dodgers appears to be the highlight of October for the squad. asserted
defeating → have → squad
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support