Embattled Greens senator Jordon Steele-John confirms leave from parliament after allegations against him made public

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Canales, S. B. (2026, October 24). Embattled Greens senator Jordon Steele-John confirms leave from parliament after allegations against him made public. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/oct/24/greens-senator-jordon-steele-john-confirms-leave-from-parliament-ntwnfb

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-24 · by Sarah Basford Canales

Quick Summary

Greens senator Jordon Steele-John has confirmed he will not attend parliamentary sessions next week following public allegations of misconduct. After considering attending virtually, he decided it would be unacceptable, instead opting to focus on an independent investigation into the claims made against him by party members and published in the media. The allegations involve inappropriate behavior towards women between 2017 and 2025, including a claim of sexual harassment at a campaign event and another unspecified allegation of "serious sexual misconduct." Steele-John denies the accusations and suggests internal political motives for their disclosure.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-24, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Jordon Steele-John, a WA Greens senator, has confirmed he will not attend Parliament next week as an independent investigation into allegations of misconduct against him gets underway. The 32-year-old senator faces multiple accusations of inappropriate behavior towards women that span nearly a decade (from 2017 to 2025). Steele-John denied the claims in an open letter and initially explored attending Senate estimates virtually but was informed this would be unacceptable. His absence follows pressure from within his party, including Greens leader David Shoebridge, who encouraged Steele-John to step aside during the inquiry.

Written for “Greens Senator Allegations Scandal” on 2026-10-24, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 103317 · logged 2026-10-24

Story

📰 Greens Senator Allegations Scandal
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (AU) · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 15 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles report on the same senator's decision not to attend parliament amid allegations of misconduct.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 14 📰 publisher trust 66
“The articles describe different statements made by Jordon Steele-John and David Shoebridge at different times, not a single specific incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 32 📰 publisher trust 61
“Article A discusses the internal dispute and David Shoebridge's stance on Steele-John taking leave during an investigation, while Article B focuses on Steele-John confirming he will not attend parliament next week and his statement about attending Senate estimates virtually.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 12% hedged 4 of 34 📰 publisher trust 61
“While both articles discuss Jordon Steele-John's situation following allegations of misconduct, they describe different aspects or stages of the ongoing incident. Article A focuses on the context and reaction to the allegations, while Article B reports on Steele-John's decision to take leave from parliament in response to those same allegations.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 13% hedged 3 of 23 📰 publisher trust 66
“While both articles discuss allegations against Jordon Steele-John and his subsequent actions, they describe different aspects of the ongoing situation (Article A discusses party leadership's response and Article B focuses on Steele-John confirming leave from parliament).”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
20
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
3 of 20 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2373 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sarah Basford Canales
14 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Jordon Steele-John has confirmed he will not attend parliament next week as the embattled Greens senator releases a letter detailing the allegations against him.
🔮 Only if two-thirds of the party room - or more than seven members - decided to expel him in a secret ballot, would Steele-John have no option but to comply.
🔮 Nine newspapers reported last week that seven party members had demanded an investigation into allegations Steel-John had acted inappropriately towards women between 2017 and 2025. Steele-John, in his Sunday night statement, said he was not on leave, contrary to Shoebridge’s comments last week, and claimed he had been pressured by the leader to request leave on Thursday as Nine’s story was breaking. “I feel that he used those meetings to repeatedly pressure me to say that I would take leave,” Steele-John said on Sunday.
🔮 Steele-John said some of the letter’s authors and signatories may have signed the letter out of “genuine commitment” to people who experienced violence but he was angry it had been politicised.
🔮 Steele-John confirmed he would leave the party room on Thursday after some details of historical complaints about inappropriate comments made to women ranging between 2017 and 2025 were publicly aired in the media.
🔮 The resources minister, Madeleine King, is facing calls to correct her claim in a major speech that all greenhouse gas emissions from developing a massive fossil fuel basin in the Northern Territory will be offset to limit their impact on the climate.
🔮 The resources minister, Madeleine King, says Australian industry will be reliant on gas for the “foreseeable future”, and that the national gas reservation scheme will push down power prices. But the Western Australian MP did not put a price tag on the cost of gas under the proposal– as the former opposition leader, Peter Dutton, once did – nor predict when households and businesses would start to see that financial relief. The national gas reservation scheme will force gas companies to set aside 20% of exports for domestic use, and is expected to come into effect from January 2028.
🔮 The One Nation MP said the party’s national head office would pay the market rate to Rinehart’s company to rent the space, claiming there would be no mate’s rates.
🔮 “No serious observer of what’s going on right now would conclude anything other than [that],” he told ABC’s Insiders.
🔮 “The Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team (VIC JCTT), comprising the AFP, Victoria Police and ASIO, can confirm it is investigating the man’s links to Australia,” an AFP spokesperson said. “An update will be provided at an appropriate time.”
Also by Sarah Basford Canales
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 14 articles by Sarah Basford Canales →

Topics

Greens Senate Western Australian the Independent Parliamentary Standards Commission the WA Greens

Subjects

Steele-John PERSON · 9× Greens ORG · 3× Senate ORG · 2× David Shoebridge PERSON · 1× Jordon Steele-John PERSON · 1× Nine ORG · 1× Shoebridge PERSON · 1× Western Australian NORP · 1× the Independent Parliamentary Standards Commission ORG · 1× the WA Greens ORG · 1×

Narrative

The 32-year-old senator’s attendance in parliament for the remainder of the year had been uncertain after a public stoush with the party’s leader, David Shoebridge, over whether he was on leave while an investigation was undertaken into allegations he had acted inappropriately towards women between 2017 and 2025.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-24
🔮 Jordon Steele-John has confirmed he will not attend parliament next week as the embattled Greens senator releases a letter detailing the allegations against him.

Claims (20 extracted, 3 hedged)

Jordon Steele-John has confirmed he will not attend parliament next week as the embattled Greens senator releases a letter detailing the allegations against him. asserted
senator → confirm → him
After days of confusion following historical complaints about alleged misconduct were publicly aired in the media, Steele-John posted a statement to social media late Friday night. asserted
John → follow → media
In the statement, the Western Australian senator said he considered attending Senate estimates virtually but was told it would be “unacceptable”. asserted
it → say → estimates
He will instead focus on seeing through an independent investigation to its conclusion, he said. asserted
he → focus → conclusion
I have explored attending digitally but have been informed that would also be unacceptable,” Steele-John said. asserted
John → explore → ?
Steele-John said a precedent of keeping parliamentarians out of parliament after “allegations of allegations” are made had now been set. asserted
allegations → say → allegations
“Had an allegation or complaint been made against me, I would have taken these actions immediately,” he said. asserted
he → make → actions
The 32-year-old senator’s attendance in parliament for the remainder of the year had been uncertain after a public stoush with the party’s leader, David Shoebridge, over whether he was on leave while an investigation was undertaken into allegations he had acted inappropriately towards women between 2017 and 2025. asserted
he → undertake → 2017
The complaints are now subject to an independent investigation commissioned by the WA Greens and have been referred to the Independent Parliamentary Standards Commission. asserted
complaints → commission → Commission
Shoebridge claimed Steele-John had requested leave and he accepted it last week after seven party members penned a letter to the leader urging an investigation into the claims. uncertain
members → claim → claims
The three-page letter sent on 13 October, and first published by the Nine newspapers, said the authors had been “made aware of multiple allegations of serious misconduct” against Steele-John about his “behaviour in the presence of women”. asserted
authors → send → women
The letter referred to an allegation of sexual harassment at a Greens campaign event in 2024 that the alleged victim had not reported out of fear and backlash. asserted
victim → refer → fear
The letter provided no further detail. asserted
letter → provide → detail
In another, the authors referred to an allegation of “serious sexual misconduct” in 2025. asserted
authors → refer → 2025
Also contained in the letter was a reference to a disparaging nickname for Steele-John – “feels on wheels” – which the authors said implied he had a reputation for acting inappropriately. asserted
he → contain → reputation
“To be clear, all signatories to this letter know that an allegation does not equate to a fact and/or guilt. asserted
allegation → know → fact
We simply believe that it is in the party’s best interests to ensure that every allegation is investigated thoroughly, in alignment with community and member expectations,” the letter’s authors wrote. asserted
authors → believe → expectations
Steele-John was defiant in a lengthy statement last Sunday, rejecting the allegations against him, denying he agreed to take leave from parliament and accusing an internal faction within the Greens of playing “nasty political games” in their decision to release the letter to the media. asserted
he → reject → media
Steele-John said any claims of his alleged behaviour should be investigated “fairly and thoroughly” but accused an “unofficial faction” within the WA branch had released the complaint letter to the media in a bid to oust him from the Senate. uncertain
faction → say → Senate
Guardian Australia has confirmed the WA police told Steele-John the investigation was closed in May with no charges. uncertain
investigation → confirm → charges
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support