Rediscovering civility, respect and the art of disagreeing well

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
Cite

Oudyn, T. (2026, October 24). Rediscovering civility, respect and the art of disagreeing well. ABC News (AU). https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-10-24/helen-haines-public-discourse-civility-respect-disagreeing/107301488

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-10-24 · by Tamara Oudyn

Quick Summary

Australians are grappling with how to engage in civil discourse following an attack on MP Helen Haines. Daniel Heller and Farid Zaid, from the Monash University initiative Brave Conversations Project, have conducted 100 workshops teaching people from various backgrounds how to disagree respectfully across a range of contentious topics. Governor-General Sam Mostyn emphasized the importance of civility in public and political dialogue, highlighting that "words matter" both spoken and written. The Scanlon Foundation Research Institute's upcoming study is expected to provide insights into social cohesion and attitudes towards respectful disagreement in Australia.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-24, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

MP Helen Haines was the victim of a shocking attack on Monday, sparking a national conversation about civility, respect, and social cohesion in Australia. Academics Daniel Heller and Farid Zaid, co-directors of the Monash University initiative Brave Conversations Project, have been discussing these issues for years with thousands of Australians across various walks of life. The project aims to help people from diverse backgrounds disagree better on contentious topics like geopolitics, climate change, reproductive ethics, AI, social media, and gender issues. Heller notes that in an age of polarization, it is often challenging to distinguish between disagreement over ideas and personal attacks, emphasizing the significant role emotions play in such interactions. Next month, the Scanlon Foundation Research Institute will release its annual study on social cohesion in Australia, providing insights into public attitudes and behavior.

Written for “Civility And Respect In Debate” on 2026-10-24, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 103276 · logged 2026-10-24

Story

📰 Civility And Respect In Debate
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 33 📰 publisher trust 69
“Article A discusses warnings about threats to Australian politicians before a specific attack, while Article B focuses on the broader national conversation about civility and respect following Monday's shocking attack on MP Helen Haines.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 6 of 53 📰 publisher trust 61
“Article A describes an urgent warning by a spy chief regarding civility in light of MP Helen Haines' attack, while Article B discusses broader questions about disagreeing well and the context of the attack on Helen Haines but focuses more on academic discussions and initiatives.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 29 📰 publisher trust 61
“While both articles discuss civility in political discourse following Helen Haines' attack, they do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 41 📰 publisher trust 61
“While both articles refer to an alleged attack on MP Helen Haines, they describe different aspects of the incident and its aftermath rather than the same specific occurrence.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
68/100
ABC News (AU)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 3826 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Tamara Oudyn
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Next month, the Scanlon Foundation Research Institute will release the findings from its annual study into social cohesion in Australia, a fascinating snapshot of how we work together, our public attitudes and our behaviour.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Australians Monash University The Alfred the Brave Conversations Project the Scanlon Foundation Research Institute

Subjects

Australians NORP · 4× Haines PERSON · 3× Heller PERSON · 3× Zaid PERSON · 2× Daniel Heller PERSON · 1× Farid Zaid PERSON · 1× Helen Haines PERSON · 1× Monash University ORG · 1× Mostyn PERSON · 1× the Brave Conversations Project ORG · 1×

Narrative

It's a question many Australians, from the governor-general and prime minister down, have been deeply considering since Monday's shocking attack on MP Helen Haines and the subsequent national conversation about civility, respect and social cohesion. And it's a question academics Daniel Heller and Farid Zaid have spent years discussing with thousands of Australians.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-24
🔮 Next month, the Scanlon Foundation Research Institute will release the findings from its annual study into social cohesion in Australia, a fascinating snapshot of how we work together, our public attitudes and our behaviour.
2026-10-24 · ABC News (AU)
Rediscovering civility, respect and the art of disagreeing well · assertive framing

Claims (33 extracted, 0 hedged)

Why is it hard to disagree well? asserted
it → disagree → ?
It's a question many Australians, from the governor-general and prime minister down, have been deeply considering since Monday's shocking attack on MP Helen Haines and the subsequent national conversation about civility, respect and social cohesion. And it's a question academics Daniel Heller and Farid Zaid have spent years discussing with thousands of Australians. asserted
Heller → consider → Australians
Dr Heller and Dr Zaid co asserted
Heller → co → ?
-direct the Brave Conversations Project,a Monash University initiative that combines psychology, neuroscience, education and philosophy to help people talk across their differences asserted
people → - → differences
They've just clocked up their 100th workshop teaching people from every imaginable walk of life how to disagree better on the topics that keep them up at night: geopolitics, climate, reproductive ethics, AI, social media and gender, to name a smattering. asserted
that → clock → smattering
"In our age of polarisation, it can often be very, very challenging to distinguish between someone who says, 'I dispute your view', and someone who is saying, 'I am attacking you, I dispute your very right to exist'," says Dr Heller. asserted
Heller → distinguish → right
Emotion, he says, plays "a huge, huge, huge role" and understanding that means "learning to become aware of what's happening, even physiologically sometimes … to accept that the emotions are a normal part of conflict … but then to remember that we have the agency between that first initial flush of emotion and what we do next. asserted
we → say → what
" "There is always that space between to reflect, to pause and to act in ways that are wise and that really come from a place of heart and values,"he said. asserted
that → be → heart
Mostyn: 'Words matter, spoken or written' asserted
Words → matter → ?
Governor-General Sam Mostyn, a close friend of Ms Haines, this week revealed that just a fortnight ago, she and Ms Haines had a deep conversation about the woeful state of public and political discourse. asserted
she → reveal → discourse
"We talked about the need for greater civility and engagement across our civic and public life," she said during a press conference at The Alfred hospital, where Ms Haines was in a critical condition after losing both her legs. " asserted
Haines → talk → legs
It's important to remember: words matter. asserted
words → remember → ?
She implored Australians to "learn or re-learn to exercise our muscle of decency". asserted
She → implore → decency
"Australians are yearning for kindness and care, and they're asking us why we've lost the great skill of disagreeing well and with decency to each other." asserted
we → yearn → other
Next month, the Scanlon Foundation Research Institute will release the findings from its annual study into social cohesion in Australia, a fascinating snapshot of how we work together, our public attitudes and our behaviour. asserted
we → release → Australia
Institute CEO Anthea Hancocks says the research shows there are reasons for optimism. asserted
research → say → optimism
"Generally, the majority of the population believe in respect, believe in a fair go, believe in people being able to have a voice in government, but being respectful if they disagree with them," she says. asserted
she → believe → them
"But I think for some people disagreeing well is really hard work. asserted
disagreeing → think → people
"And if you get entrenched in the sense that your view is the right view, rather than simply a view, then you do tend to end up with people who will not listen on the other side. asserted
who → entrench → side
I think the vast majority think they are on the right side of any argument, simply because they've done the thinking and that's where they've landed and so it must be right. asserted
it → think → thinking
And then of course, if you go onto social media or to your friends and they're all agreeing with you, then it's simply reinforcing the fact that, yes, you're right. asserted
you → go → fact
So it is very difficult to break into that." asserted
it → break → that
So how can we disagree better? asserted
we → disagree → ?
Dr Zaid and Dr Heller believe it's possible to learn the key skills of listening, testing people's ideas and challenging them in ways that kick conversations along, rather than shut them down. asserted
that → believe → them
They recommend asking thoughtful questions in an effort to understand other people's points of view. asserted
They → recommend → view
For example: "What I'm hearing is … did I get that right?" "What led you to feel that way?" "Can you help me understand why you feel strongly about this?" "What experiences shaped your perspective on this?" "How confident are you, on a scale of 0–100?". asserted
you → hear → 0–100
If they say "90 per cent", answer: "Tell me about that other 10 per cent" "Where do you feel torn?" "What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of this approach?" How do you know if you've done it well? Dr Zaid believes the mark of a successful disagreement is that you'd both be happy to return to the conversation. asserted
you → say → conversation
"For us, a successful disagreement is one in which both people leave feeling that they've been taken seriously, even if neither has shifted an inch," says Dr Zaid. asserted
Zaid → leave → feeling
"Sometimes we need to be comfortable leaving a question open, resisting that very human desire to have the final word. asserted
we → need → word
"When you discover that you can disagree profoundly with someone and still enjoy their company, you become a little less frightened of encountering difference in the world. asserted
you → discover → world
" And like any muscle, skills around disagreeing well get stronger the more effort you put in. asserted
you → disagree → muscle
"Disagreement, when it's done well, can be a pathway to not just learning, not just innovation, not just personal growth, but also authentic human connection," Dr Heller says. asserted
Heller → do → learning
"What can happen when we don't service the disagreements, when we don't share what we're thinking, is that we also don't get to share our authentic selves and that can be an extraordinarily lonely and alienating experience." asserted
that → happen → selves
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support