Deciding with fake images: More candidates are using AI in political ads to get your vote

Read the original at NBC News ↗
Cite

Vílchez, A. (2026, October 23). Deciding with fake images: More candidates are using AI in political ads to get your vote. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/deciding-fake-images-candidates-are-using-ai-political-ads-get-vote-rcna605243

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

NBC News · collected 2026-10-23 · by Anagilmara Vílchez

Quick Summary

South Carolina Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette faced a political ad using AI to create a fake scenario where she failed a polygraph test, confusing many voters about its authenticity. The Wesleyan Media Project reported that at least 220 ads produced or enhanced with artificial intelligence were used in the midterm elections, costing nearly $137 million—significantly more than the less than $50,000 spent on AI ads during the 2024 presidential election cycle. This rise in AI-generated political content raises concerns about voter deception and confusion over what is real or fabricated.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-24, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

South Carolina Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette faced confusion among voters when her opponents used artificial intelligence (AI) to create a fake political ad showing her undergoing a polygraph test that ends with the lie detector catching fire. Although the video included disclaimers stating it was an AI-generated dramatization, some voters still questioned its authenticity during her campaign for the Republican gubernatorial nomination. This incident highlights how AI tools are increasingly being used in political ads to influence voter opinions, despite ongoing debates over regulating such technology. Two federal bills are pending that aim to require conspicuous notices in ads using AI and prohibit generating materially deceptive content depicting candidates.

Written for “AI In Political Ads” on 2026-10-24, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.50, but 2 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 3 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 103034: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-24

Story

📰 AI In Political Ads
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 21% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 60
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI use in political campaigns and do not describe the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
95
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
21%
20 of 95 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
95/100
NBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

NBC News · 1687 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Anagilmara Vílchez
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Like, nobody could possibly believe this?”
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Noticias Telemundo Republican South Carolina The Wesleyan Media Project Washington State University

Subjects

Evette PERSON · 7× Ridout PERSON · 4× Noticias Telemundo ORG · 3× Alan Wilson PERSON · 2× South Carolina GPE · 2× The Wesleyan Media Project ORG · 2× Pamela Evette PERSON · 1× Republican NORP · 1× Travis Ridout PERSON · 1× Washington State University ORG · 1×

Narrative

A matter of transparency At least two federal bills to regulate AI in politics are pending discussion and approval by lawmakers. One seeks to ensure that advertisements have conspicuous notices that artificial intelligence tools have been used; the other attempts to prohibit this technology “to generate materially deceptive content falsely depicting federal candidates in political ads to influence federal elections.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-24
🔮 Like, nobody could possibly believe this?”

Claims (95 extracted, 20 hedged)

South Carolina Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette appears distressed in a gloomy room as she undergoes a polygraph test that ends with the lie detector catching fire. asserted
detector → appear → fire
Although the video clarifies that the “dramatizations” in this political ad are generated with artificial intelligence, some voters still asked her whether what they saw was real, Evette told Noticias Telemundo. asserted
Evette → clarify → Telemundo
At first, Evette said she thought, “This is ridiculous, right? asserted
This → say → ?
Like, nobody could possibly believe this?” uncertain
nobody → believe → this
Later, as she traveled the state during her campaign to become the Republican gubernatorial nominee — a race she lost in June to Attorney General Alan Wilson — she said she encountered voters who were confused about the video’s veracity. asserted
who → travel → veracity
“On the campaign trail, I would have people ask me, like, ‘Oh my gosh, did they really make you take a lie-detector test?’” Evette said. asserted
Evette → have → test
She then had to explain to them that it never happened and it was an AI-generated fake ad. asserted
it → have → them
“So you almost think it’s a joke and you kind of laugh at it, until you realize that there is a group of people out there that can’t tell the difference,” she said, “and then start to question if what they’re saying may be true.” uncertain
saying → think → what
Evette is not the only one whose image was manipulated in the lead-up to the midterm elections. asserted
image → manipulate → elections
The Wesleyan Media Project, a group of experts that tracks political propaganda in campaigns, identified at least 220 ads produced or enhanced with artificial intelligence by candidates or political action committees this election cycle. asserted
that → track → candidates
They cost just under $137 million. asserted
They → cost → million
It’s a significant leap in the use of this technology compared to 2024, when the investment in AI was less than $50,000 during the presidential election. asserted
investment → ’ → election
As of May of this year, the money spent on these AI ads was already $20 million. uncertain
money → spend → ads
“We really saw the growth in AI ads over the summer,” Travis Ridout, a professor at Washington State University and one of the project directors, told Noticias Telemundo. asserted
Ridout → see → Telemundo
“A lot of them were connected with closely fought primary races.” asserted
lot → connect → races
The lieutenant governor of South Carolina saw two videos of herself generated with artificial intelligence, or deepfakes, but she also shared one that falsely depicted her opponent, Alan Wilson, rejecting a call from President Donald Trump. asserted
opponent → see → Trump
According to Evette, her campaign used artificial intelligence after the ads featuring her circulated. uncertain
ads → accord → her
“But we said it, ‘This ad is AI-generated,’” she said. asserted
she → say → it
The videos targeting Evette are said to have been paid for by a PAC; the one released against her opponent was funded by the lieutenant governor’s campaign. asserted
one → target → campaign
A request for comment sent to Wilson was not immediately returned. asserted
request → send → Wilson
In response to a query from Noticias Telemundo on social media, nearly 40 people said they had seen political ads generated with artificial intelligence. asserted
they → say → intelligence
Some admitted that they have difficulty distinguishing them. asserted
they → admit → them
“And that could be deceptive; voters could be basing their decisions on falsehoods in that case,” Ridout said. uncertain
Ridout → base → case
“That’s, I think, what’s most concerning from a democratic perspective.” asserted
what → ’ → perspective
In the absence of a federal law regulating them, the responsibility falls to local governments, said Ridout, who estimates that about 30 states have some type of rule or requirement regarding AI in political campaigns. asserted
states → regulate → campaigns
Of the 220 ads analyzed by the Wesleyan Media Project, only 27% revealed they used artificial intelligence tools. asserted
they → analyze → tools
Candidates with smaller campaign budgets rely on artificial intelligence to compete with their rivals, Ridout suggested. uncertain
Ridout → rely → rivals
“I think it’s here to stay. asserted
it → think → ?
I don’t know that it’s going to go away,” said Evette. asserted
Evette → know → ?
Campaigns “are extremely expensive,” she noted, and AI reduces many recording and editing costs. asserted
AI → note → costs
These tools could also “unlock” more creativity in political advertising, said Ridout, “which wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world.” uncertain
which → unlock → world
He said the possibilities are practically endless and include satire. asserted
possibilities → say → satire
Among the ads he analyzed, he saw candidates emerging from a swamp, boxing against Trump, or appearing alongside physicist Albert Einstein, who died in 1955. asserted
who → analyze → 1955
“I do worry about the lasting impact of those images, even if people know that it might not be true,” Ridout said. uncertain
Ridout → worry → images
He noted those images might stick in their mind when they’re voting, or it may even generate waves of misinformation that trigger violence. uncertain
that → note → violence
AI can “redefine” modern political campaigns, the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonprofit institute whose experts have analyzed the potential impact of this technology on democracy, said in an article. asserted
experts → redefine → article
Mekela Panditharatne, legal adviser and director of the center’s Elections and Government Program, said that without disclosure, “generative AI use in political ads has the potential to distort perceptions of candidates, painting candidates in a flattering light or their opponents in a negative light.” asserted
use → say → light
During the Minnesota primaries, a deepfake circulated showing Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate, smiling amid mountains of money. asserted
Flanagan → show → money
A spokesperson from her office said that although it didn’t stop them from winning the primary, there was alarm over the impact of the AI-generated video. asserted
it → say → video
“There is already too much distrust in our politics, and voters deserve to know what’s real and what’s not,” the spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → be → politics
…and 55 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support